Dr Death was a name I knew back then but wasn’t familiar with the guy.
And the back then I’m referring to was pre-attitude era.
Bart Gunn Got Screwed
and I dont know if it has been discussed here but a talent (non wrestler) has tested positive for COVID
SHUT IT ALL DOWN
The Interim cruiserweight championship tournament will be round robin.
https://twitter.com/WWE/status/1249007630925942787
Let's see how WWE does best of the super juniors.
Also with Bayley they made sure that it was made clear that she was inferior to Charlotte and could only win via shenanigans.
The problem with the Samoa Joe comparison that X-Pac keeps making is that Joe was genuinely over and getting responses. Charlotte has never been as over as her push would imply. She's more like Roman, only even worse in terms of cramming her down the fans throats.
What's really insufferable is that Charlotte keeps tapping her opponents out clean as a heel. But do you know when the last time she tapped out on TV was? Pre-Summerslam, in 2018!!!! That's ridiculous for a heel. Even Becky during their entire feud was never allowed to tap Charlotte out with her finisher once. Asuka has never been allowed to either, yet Charlotte has made her tap clean three times. She no sold Bianca's spear completely and beat her seconds later.
Then you have Sasha, Asuka, Rhea, etc on-camera verbally kissing Charlotte's butt, just so WWE can beat it into your head how great she is, it's no wonder many fans are sick of her.
Last edited by Punisher007; 04-11-2020 at 05:26 PM.
Frankly I'd argue that both Roman and Charlotte are over. They're not necessarily internet darlings, but to the general WWE audience overall I'd say they're just as over as Joe. Roman probably moreso to be quite honest. Yes, Roman got boos but by any objective tangible measurable standard (merchandise, ratings segments, buy rates, etc) Roman is probably the most over fulltime male superstar in the company. So comparing her to Charlotte isn't doing her a whole lot of harm.
can't see how she can be the best if she doesn't work well as a face and is also hard to get a rub off as a heel(is she a heel this week??).
but that win was so meaningful!!
i don't know if people remember this but 1)joe was in the x-division when he 1st came to TNA so he was a monster in the division 2)it lasted about 2 years and 3)the x-division was in pretty rough shape when joe was done with it because he choked everybody out and never got pinned or submitted to drop the title. so yeah good for joe, not the division.The problem with the Samoa Joe comparison that X-Pac keeps making is that Joe was genuinely over and getting responses. Charlotte has never been as over as her push would imply. She's more like Roman, only even worse in terms of cramming her down the fans throats.
What's really insufferable is that Charlotte keeps tapping her opponents out clean as a heel. But do you know when the last time she tapped out on TV was? Pre-Summerslam, in 2018!!!! That's ridiculous for a heel. Even Becky during their entire feud was never allowed to tap Charlotte out with her finisher once. Asuka has never been allowed to either, yet Charlotte has made her tap clean three times. She no sold Bianca's spear completely and beat her seconds later.
Then you have Sasha, Asuka, Rhea, etc on-camera verbally kissing Charlotte's butt, just so WWE can beat it into your head how great she is, it's no wonder many fans are sick of her.
also remember when xpac tried to sell us that charlotte was needed in the mania main event to "either take the pin" or "give the fans somebody to boo"??
the problems with charlotte's booking is easy to see for anybody who isn't choosing to turn a blind eye to it.
Last edited by BigLbo; 04-11-2020 at 06:38 PM.
CHarlotte's usualy a heel, so boo's aren't an issue with her like Roman. Plus, Charlotte is more likely to give you the match of the night than Roman is (even though Roman IMO is at times underrated). It's harder to boo someone that's giving you some of the best matches on the show.
But generally speaking there often is a backlash against wrestlers who are at the top. Cena is the most obvious example. I'll bet money Becky a year from now will be on the receiving end of that too, if not sooner. It is what it is. Charlotte gets backlash, but it's basically white noise as long as she's a heel (which is most of the time). It was more obvious when she was a face, but turning her heel largely mitigates any issues that backlash might cause.
Becasuse the company books its top babyfaces really ,really poorly.Cena got hate largely becasuse his run as WWE's top guy consisted of him buring talent left and right.Winning when he really wasnt supposed to (Nexus feud for example).The only way the dude lost during that time was due to screwy finishes.
Last edited by Baseman; 04-11-2020 at 08:48 PM.
There's honestly not a whole lot unusual about how Cena was handled. Bruno, Hogan, Warrior, Austin, Undertaker, Rock ... they almost never lost. Thats sort of what it means to be a top babyface. It's what separates a Hogan from a Brutus Beefcake or a Austin from a Christian or a Cena from a Miz... they are dominant.
If people don't like it then they don't like it, but let's not pretend this is anything new. WWE has always booked their top babyfaces this way.
I guess it depends on how you define a lot. Cena is a 16 time world champion, so he clearly lost the belt a fair number of times too.
I'd still argue it's pretty fair to say Cena, Austin and Rock rarely lost. And when they a lot of the time as faces at least it wasn't entirely clean. Again, that's what it means to be a top face.