If that's LITERALLY true, then honestly I'm not sure that's an improvement.
Yes, it potentially means the curtain jerkers are better able to make a living. But to me at least it makes sense that a AJ Styles would earn more than a Curtis Hawkins. I think performers who are able to better entertain the crowd and generate more money deserve to get paid more. Maybe that's just my capitalist western mind set.
ASSUMING they get Omega, is he really going to get the exact same paycheck as everyone else in the lockeroom? I don't know... we'll see how long this system lasts, or if it'll even actually work out that way.