Originally Posted by
Punisher007
I do think it holds water because there are other talented women on the roster who do not get these opportunities.
What made Roman "Roman" and made people turn against him, despite him being a really good performer actually (as is Charlotte) was that he was constantly forced into big situations whether or not he "earned" them in-story or not.
Charlotte is the same way:
-Becky won the RR, eliminating Charlotte. Yet Charlotte gets put into the Mania ME just because she's Charlotte, and Becky (who won the RR), has to beat Charlotte AGAIN at Fastlane to get into the match that she already earned.
-Charlotte shows up on SDL and is handed a title match out of nowhere with no explanation (even the commentators seemed like they didn't know how to explain it and were trying to make something up on the fly), and despite doing nothing to earn it (and a #1 contender's match being advertised as late as the previous day). And she's booked to win as decisively as possible, and Asuka is screwed out of her own Mania match.
-The only explanation seems to be, she's Charlotte and she NEEDS that title going into Mania in WWE's minds.
-Etc.
THIS is where the Roman comparisons come in. For comparison, Roman kept losing to Brock, yet kept being gifted more title shots with little to no explanation for why. Braun didn't get a rematch when lost to Brock, nor did Joe, nor did Finn, nor did Kane, etc. Yet Roman did seemingly, just because he's Roman. And many perceive Charlotte the same way as well.