I was just stating the facts, and reminding some people how unimportant the book became after Remender left. Some people see being a leader of a secondary Avengers team as some sort of big recognition or a mark of high status and I simply don't, to me is the same as being a leader of a secondary X-men team.
With only three issues of MMX I can already say that that is false, the introduction of Xavier and Lilandra child is something that is going to affect the Shi'ar empire from here on now.
Also is obvious that is just a matter of time before X appears again in the X-books.
It's hard to discuss about personality because is something very subjective, what might be right for you could be wrong for someone else. But I'll say this, Duggan (the man you guys praise so much) tweeted Kelly congratulating her for what she did in R+G and how much he enjoyed it, which means Thompson's Rogue can not be so different from his version, and it's hard to disagree with the writer of UA himself.
And in terms of powers what I said are facts, her development in power control was COMPLETELY ERASED and she went back to "Ah can't control my powers + flying brick" state and that is indisputable, so much progress and development in UA yeah right...
I almost gree. Secondary X-men team would be almost equally good. A little weaker because everyone would know each other.
We obviously will see but...With only three issues of MMX I can already say that that is false, the introduction of Xavier and Lilandra child is something that is going to affect the Shi'ar empire from here on now.
Also is obvious that is just a matter of time before X appears again in the X-books.
This child will be killed or will became new leader of Shi'ar empire(and he/she will be never shown again and Shi'ar will have new leader before X-men will meet them again).
or something similar
She had progress in different areas (like personality).It's hard to discuss about personality because is something very subjective, what might be right for you could be wrong for someone else. But I'll say this, Duggan (the man you guys praise so much) tweeted Kelly congratulating her for what she did in R+G and how much he enjoyed it, which means Thompson's Rogue can not be so different from his version, and it's hard to disagree with the writer of UA himself.
And in terms of powers what I said are facts, her development in power control was COMPLETELY ERASED and she went back to "Ah can't control my powers + flying brick" state and that is indisputable, so much progress and development in UA yeah right...
Rogue by KT had all progress erased(except powers).
about Duggan:
argument to authority? really?
I gave You facts(Rogue wanted to be with Gambit. She wasn't afraid to stat relationship. Xtreme X-men).
Gambit was cheating her(his solo)
You started with argument to authority...
some reasons why Your argument is completly useless:
- this is argument to authority
- Duggan sometimes writes bad stories
- maybe he didn't read all Rogue and Gambit stories
what about Claremont(if You like authorities?)
what he created about them?
his Rogue wasn't afraid and his Gambit was cheating her.
which means that You shouldn't like KT work because Claremont wrote that Rogue and Gambit are different
Last edited by Xelossik; 10-04-2018 at 12:57 PM.
@Xelossik
I can't understand most of what you wrote towards the end, so I'll simply get to the point and leave because I don't have the energy or will to keep going.
Like I've told you many times before: PEOPLE CHANGE!!! Just because someone did something or thought something in the past doesn't mean that person will think or act in the same way in the present or in the future.
If you were showing us panels of events that happened recently your arguments would make sense, but it's hard to take anything you say seriously when you keep pointing out to stories that happened like 15 years ago. Again, it's time to stop living in 2004 and join the rest of us in 2018.
Yes. People change. Thats why it is sad that Rogue development was forgotten.
In Xtreme X-men, Austen run, Milligan run Rogue wasn't afraid. She was afraid earlier.
ending of previous post:
just because Duggan said something... it doesn't mean that i should think like him.
he rate mini series
i rate whole stories of characters
and if there are only one good explanation(character had a lot of character development off panel) to make story logical... that's terrible story for me
They're teasing just that....
But I think Nightcrawler is more likely. Aaron wrote Amazing X-Men.
EDIT: And just saw it mentioned on the previous page - that's Blade, not Gladiator.
Last edited by Digifiend; 10-11-2018 at 04:39 PM.
Appreciation Thread Indexes
Marvel | Spider-Man | X-Men | NEW!! DC Comics | Batman | Superman | Wonder Woman
Appreciation Thread Indexes
Marvel | Spider-Man | X-Men | NEW!! DC Comics | Batman | Superman | Wonder Woman
They're probably going to be ironic and use Doop or Howard the Duck... Because Marvel 2018.
Guild Member
Realistically speaking about fictional matters. | Nutcases need not respond. | Stay outta my DMs. | Why does the "House of Ideas" keep duplicating characters?! | If an idea or belief cannot stand up to criticism it's probably... bad.