DC was planning to kill Jason anyway. They made money off that 1-900 number. There would have to be a replacement because of the merchandising, and the only hard rule was the new character had to be named Tim, in honor of Tim Burton. Tim was created to be a nice kid who just wanted to help out the Bats and meanwhile had his own family, which was a HELL of a lot more interesting than supercomputerbrain orphan/quasi-orphan instant-just-add-water worldclass perfection. The male forerunner of Harper Row. They should have stuck with Jason and let him grow into the role instead of throwing him out in such an ugly, vicious way as being beaten to death by the Joker.
Hard to say really. I imagine Jason would be very different had he lived. Maybe he would still be an anti-hero maybe he would've left and picked a new identity like Dick did with Nightwing. We might not have gotten Tim Drake for a much longer time.
What about Joker?
Killing Robin was a HUGE feather in Joker's cap... but Joker wasn't really... really REALLY that dangerous before this. A death here or there, but even in the 60's show Riddler and Penguin were considered more 'arch-enemies' to Batman than Joker was.
What would Joker be like now if they didn't have to constantly try to one-up his earlier victory? Would Two-face or Riddler be higher status?
In TKJ he crippled Barbara. And DITF didn't really made him more dangerous imo. He had put Batman and Robin in Death Traps for Decades at this point, the only difference is that Jason didn't escape this time.
Just look at his first appearances in Batman #1 (were he is way more scary than in DITF imo), there he would have killed Dick if Batman had only arrived a few seconds later.
Yeah, a "version" of her.
Aahz, are you arguing for the sake of arguing? Every single villain put the heros's lives in danger, but only few of them were able to success. Jason not escaping made a big difference and raised Joker's status as a vilain.
To be fair it's subjective. Killing Jason while brutal didn't make Joker anymore menacing to me. Killing Joke now that was cruel and fucked up. That was hardcore.There are thing's worse than death.
People die in crime and superhero comics and novels. The psychological torture in TKJ is Brutal. With Jason he's rise from the grave gets me more than his death. His living with the knowledge and memory of his death is more cruel to me.
The fact that Jason was already alive and kicking and Joker was already a killer by the time I read DITF might have a factor in my feelings. Those who were reading at the time of publishing might feel differently about that story yet TKJ is still fucked and still gets me. Even the movie scene was hard to watch.
However there is no arguing that DITF did elevate the Joker as a villain. Just for being the Villain who killed Robin. Batman' sidekick and son. That's big.
And this my point.
I'm not arguing about which story was better or what your feeling about it. I'm saying that he raised the level of "danger" by succeeding in killing a hero and gaining a win over Batman. The joker wouldn't have been the same if DITF didn't happen.
If we are talking about which Batman story is darker and messed up, it's neither TKJ nor DITF. To me, it's Night Cries.
Last edited by Rise; 08-26-2018 at 03:10 AM.