Whedon actually treated the Hulk as how scary he can actually be.
Can't that also be a genuine part of themselves? It's not like the person they're pretending to be is that disingenuous to who they are.
It is mostly due to Jameson, which is why I said smear campaign, but usually Peter being able to do something about it is out of his hands.Isn't that mostly due to Jameson? And Peter hiding himself exacerbates that.
Well, Civil War did bring about changes, they just kind of imploded.Yeah, but that's not how Marvel acted, because it couldn't bring itself to actually change how things are done.
For work colleagues I think it makes sense. But I've never felt like it was a must for their interactions to be genuine, because you do know them, just their current projection of themselves.Idk. It would be a bit weird to be friends with someone you don't really know. I liked how the MCU actually allowed these characters to be open about who they were. I don't think there interactions would be as interesting otherwise.
But can't the logic be seen as valid?But I find the reasoning to be circular logic used to justify the whole thing in the first place.
They really just do not want Ruffalo on-screen with anyone from The Incredible Hulk.
I guess time will tell if he and Abomination share screentime in She-Hulk.
Multiverse of Madness?