Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 79
  1. #61
    Spectacular Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xhx23x View Post
    Going by History and since Sinister's the provider of this I am going with Gambit.

    Though I think this is a stupid ass plot point regardless of who the mole is.
    Two Words: Xmen Forever.

    tsk tsk tsk

  2. #62
    Invincible Member Havok83's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    28,006

    Default

    Maybe the file was Quicksilver and this will be used to undo the retcon. Tony said it came from the X-database and maybe Sinister had him categorized under there bc of his connection to Magneto and/or X-Factor. If this revelation is tied to him, that could get them to prompt another look into his genetics to confirm that he is in fact a mutant
    Last edited by Havok83; 08-12-2018 at 10:17 AM.

  3. #63
    Astonishing Member mikeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Grand Rapids,Mich
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JDC001 View Post
    Two Words: Xmen Forever.

    tsk tsk tsk
    Three words: X-Men The End.

  4. #64
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,227

    Default

    There is no mole. Sinister just planted that little nugget of misinformation (and a few others...) in his files to mess with anyone who hacked him.

    If the X-Men tear each other apart looking for an imaginary mole, and go all j'accuse and don't trust each other, well, that's just icing on the cake.

  5. #65
    The King Fears NO ONE! Triniking1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,950

    Default

    It's someone who didn't make it into the Uncanny X-Men Disassembled teaser which means it's...

    *spins a roulette*

    Pyro II

    Sucks to suck.

  6. #66
    Mighty Member Jesse-James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Triniking1234 View Post
    It's someone who didn't make it into the Uncanny X-Men Disassembled teaser which means it's...

    *spins a roulette*

    Pyro II

    Sucks to suck.
    There is one X-Men character with a red stone on his forehead..... and he's also not on that cover.
    Now would that not explain how he got that red diamond there?
    Just contributing to wild speculation.

  7. #67
    Fantastic Member Maniacal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    373

    Default

    for story reasons... I'd want it to be:

    Beast - which is why his body keeps changing with his experiments... unstable.
    Rachel - Sinister's insistence on the Summers/Grey DNA... and then Rachel returned. The Phoenix also didn't run back to her...
    Pyro II - would add some spice to Iceman's story, but is it shocking?

    As for who I wouldn't want:
    Gambit - makes too much sense... Not shocking enough.
    Psylocke - with whats going on with her... too easy of a twist. Not shocking enough.
    Hope - you'd think the Phoenix force would see that... when it came for her. Could be shocking.
    Firestar - was first recruited by Emma Frost and became a Hellion. Sinister would have to wait a long time to infiltrate the Xmen considering she was technically a rival. Is it shocking enough? Or just confusing?
    Storm - just stop messing with her... vampire, de-aged mutate, hammer-wielder, goddess, avenger... meh.
    Banshee - would be... not interesting enough of a story.

  8. #68
    Mighty Member Marvelboy1974's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    1,289

    Default

    Just don't let it be adult Jean Grey. What a slap in the face it would be to her fans.
    Storm: Been there done that in X-men Forever: epic fail
    Rachel: unfortunately would make sense after the way she has been treated as of late
    Gambit: too predictable
    Hope: That would be shocking and Bishop's reasons for trying to kill her would make sense
    Nightcrawler: It wouldn't make any sense
    Iceman: same as Nightcrawler
    Kitty: Now that would be the shocker right there

  9. #69
    Mighty Member Marvelboy1974's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    1,289

    Default

    Just don't let it be adult Jean Grey. What a slap in the face it would be to her fans.
    Storm: Been there done that in X-men Forever: epic fail
    Rachel: unfortunately would make sense after the way she has been treated as of late
    Gambit: too predictable
    Hope: That would be shocking and Bishop's reasons for trying to kill her would make sense
    Nightcrawler: It wouldn't make any sense
    Iceman: same as Nightcrawler
    Kitty: Now that would be the shocker right there

  10. #70
    Fantastic Member razzmatazz360's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    france
    Posts
    277

    Default

    the mole was Threnody

  11. #71
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    The Eagle
    Posts
    3,432

    Default

    Two longtime characters with a story rationale I could see:

    Psylocke: Her twin brother isn’t a mutant, she and her siblings may have been bioengineered at Merlyn’s request, psychic abilities aren’t unusual among Otherworlders (which her father was one), her joining the X-Men was revealed to have been manipulated by Roma in order to ensure Excalibur’s formation, put these things together and there’s a solid case Betsy could not be a mutant but may have been made to appear one to further Merlyn and Roma’s plans.

    Rachel: This one’s iffier but if they went ahead with Claremont’s original intended origin for her she’s essentially a (baby) cosmic force thinking it’s a human. There also a dangler from way back where Moira noticed something unusual and alarming in Rachel’s DNA that was never revealed.

  12. #72
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    4,306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by razzmatazz360 View Post
    the mole was Threnody
    that makes sense since she worked for sinister (was his captive). She's back again in Deadpool.

  13. #73
    BANNED SonOfPsylocke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    210

    Default

    The next person who says Psylocke, I am going to get the admins involved.

  14. #74
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    The Eagle
    Posts
    3,432

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SonOfPsylocke View Post
    The next person who says Psylocke, I am going to get the admins involved.
    What if I say Spylocke?

  15. #75
    BANNED SonOfPsylocke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DDM View Post
    What if I say Spylocke?
    Do not, Sharif! Or there will be darknessatnoon.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •