Wonder Woman should have scars from some of her battles. Like ones where she's fought the strongest monsters and gods.
Not to the extent they like to have Batman, but just some here and there.
Wonder Woman should have scars from some of her battles. Like ones where she's fought the strongest monsters and gods.
Not to the extent they like to have Batman, but just some here and there.
~I just keep swimming through these threads~
Last edited by Gaius; 03-04-2023 at 06:11 PM.
She should at least have some burn marks from her first fight Ares as well as claw marks from Cheetah.
New head canon: Wonder Woman uses a special ointment to hide her scars. Not because she is ashamed of them or anything, she just doesn't like people asking about them and doesn't feel they're appropriate in some settings. She also thinks it might help her get through to Barbara.
The CBR Community Guidelines & Rules | Report but also PM me directly
Ruka did write in his first run about how wounds from gods don't heal naturally...
Zaldrīzes Buzdari Iksos Daor
Writers who say WW is "just too hard to write" should just say they don't like/get the character and accept there are others who have done better than them rather than trying to make out writing WW requires having some or sort Doctorate in Neuroscience.
A.K.A "Mark Waid Syndrome".
It's corporate speak. Creators can't just go and say "hey, I'm not that interested in this character but she's famous and I'm kinda forced to write her" and saying "I just don't get it and didn't didn't wat to spent time doing the homework" makes you look dumb and/or lazy.
It always carries the air of self-congratulatory patting on the back. It also comes off as belittling and insulting to writers who did do great with the character, too much pride to admit there is no writer who "can write everyone" regardless of how much a self-proclaimed "I love everything about DC" fanboy they are.
Goes to what I said above. Always couched with the implication that since he couldn't do the character right or has found a story to his liking than clearly no one has.
I mean yeah, sure. I suppose WW might be harder to write than "guy who runs really really really fast this time" but that says more abut Waid than it does WW.
He actually just addressed it in a Word Balloon interview and was talking about how he thinks the bondage/sexuality and proto-feminist elements of the GA books were the key to her success and staying power and he doesn't feel equipped to address that.
You can debate the merit of that all day - I'd argue that Morrison's Earth One would be a lot more popular and definitive if it were true - but it definitely says quite a bit about Waid. He's a nostalgia guy, just like so many other superhero writers. His entire process involves riffing on the Silver Age stuff he read when he was 12. He doesn't have his typical source material to draw from because that era was hijacked by Kanigher, so his only solution is to look back to the earliest possible interpretation that worked and he can't access it. Same deal with Geoff Johns, dude's entire approach is working with the stuff he liked as a kid in the '70s-early '80s and he's had 2 notable interpretations of the character - stale, distinctly non-WW sword maiden archetype (his n52-era stuff) and woefully out-of-date Lynda Carter/Donner Superman pastiche (WW84).
Jimenez is the only big nostalgia guy who's done strong work on WW and he's a lot less puritanical about it than Mark Waid. He's got his dealbreakers but his preferences skew Marston and he built his masterpiece around Kelly Sue DeConnick's pitch that began with "I'm rejecting Marston."