Page 188 of 190 FirstFirst ... 88138178184185186187188189190 LastLast
Results 2,806 to 2,820 of 2846
  1. #2806
    Ultimate Member Havok83's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    15,976

    Default

    Scott says he loved a single person in today's X-men but he didnt give a name

  2. #2807
    Extraordinary Member ExodusCloak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    8,773

    Default

    He said he'll simplify it for the summoner. If it anything it implies the complete opposite that it's more complicated

  3. #2808
    Extraordinary Member spirit2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    9,391

    Default

    Love can mean: sister, brother, friends, father, mother.

    There is lots of types of love. Scott simplified it about being about one person. he didn't even say if it was men or woman.

    Basically more teasing and trolling
    Zethrimon unblock me

  4. #2809
    Astonishing Member Glio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    2,609

    Default

    English is not my first language. "Single anyone" can mean only one person or one person without a partner, right?

  5. #2810
    Ultimate Member Havok83's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    15,976

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spirit2011 View Post
    Love can mean: sister, brother, friends, father, mother.

    There is lots of types of love. Scott simplified it about being about one person. he didn't even say if it was men or woman.

    Basically more teasing and trolling
    This was a romantic love, not friend or family. He has lots of friends and family so only loving a single one of them doesnt make sense in this context. Having a single person he currently has romantic love for however does

    Quote Originally Posted by Glio View Post
    English is not my first language. "Single anyone" can mean only one person or one person without a partner, right?
    in this context its one person, not relationship status
    Last edited by Havok83; 11-13-2019 at 09:30 AM.

  6. #2811
    Extraordinary Member spirit2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    9,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glio View Post
    English is not my first language. "Single anyone" can mean only one person or one person without a partner, right?
    "Single anyone" can mean: separate invidual from a "crowd".

    needs more context.

    Read again is 'I love a single someone"

    Quote Originally Posted by Havok83 View Post
    This was a romantic love, not friend or family. He has lots of friends and family so only loving a single one of them doesnt make sense in this context. Having a single person he currently has romantic love for however does
    Well later the summoner says Them. I don't think it is only romantic, it never says it is romance.
    Last edited by spirit2011; 11-13-2019 at 09:35 AM.
    Zethrimon unblock me

  7. #2812
    Astonishing Member Omega Alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExodusCloak View Post
    He said he'll simplify it for the summoner. If it anything it implies the complete opposite that it's more complicated
    Exactly. He says for the sake of expediency. he loves a single someone, but seems clear the answer is much more complicated than this.

  8. #2813
    Ultimate Member Havok83's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    15,976

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spirit2011 View Post
    Well later the summoner says Them. I don't think it is only romantic, it never says it is romance.
    Them is a gender neutral pronoun as Scott didnt specify male or female and the concept of gender and sexuality might be foreign to the Summoner

    Quote Originally Posted by Omega Alpha View Post
    Exactly. He says for the sake of expediency. he loves a single someone, but seems clear the answer is much more complicated than this.
    I took it a he has one person that he is in love with and wants to be with but the complciation comes in that he might also have feelings beyond that for someone else, which isnt exactly love

  9. #2814
    Extraordinary Member spirit2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    9,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havok83 View Post
    Them is a gender neutral pronoun as Scott didnt specify male or female and the concept of gender and sexuality might be foreign to the Summoner
    The summoner doesn't know what a gender neutral pronoun is. It would be far easier "so you want to be close to that person".

    Quote Originally Posted by Havok83 View Post
    I took it a he has one person that he is in love with and wants to be with but the complciation comes in that he might also have feelings beyond that for someone else, which isnt exactly love
    Or tha tthe relationship is complicated
    Zethrimon unblock me

  10. #2815
    Astonishing Member Omega Alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havok83 View Post
    I took it a he has one person that he is in love with and wants to be with but the complciation comes in that he might also have feelings beyond that for someone else, which isnt exactly love
    If he was only in love with one person, he would just say it.

  11. #2816
    Ultimate Member Havok83's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    15,976

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spirit2011 View Post
    The summoner doesn't know what a gender neutral pronoun is. It would be far easier "so you want to be close to that person".
    How do you know?

  12. #2817
    Extraordinary Member spirit2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    9,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havok83 View Post
    How do you know?
    It's a very modern take on language. I will say I'm not used to it yet.
    Zethrimon unblock me

  13. #2818
    Astonishing Member DragonPiece's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,881

    Default

    I don’t like Scott’s statement because it just means there is already someone who is lesser in this relationship and it’s not on equal grounds. I hope Hickman at least doesn’t state who that person Scott loves and leaves it to the audience to guess.

  14. #2819
    Astonishing Member Omega Alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DragonPiece View Post
    I don’t like Scott’s statement because it just means there is already someone who is lesser in this relationship and it’s not on equal grounds. I hope Hickman at least doesn’t state who that person Scott loves and leaves it to the audience to guess.
    No, there is nothing of the sort.

  15. #2820
    The King Fears NO ONE! Triniking1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,891

    Default

    Hickman is just baiting you guys now. smfh.
    "Cable was right!"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •