His overall point about superhero movies having a huge market influence and being formulaic is true, but Logan is an odd choice. It is inspired by Westerns, and I’d happily contend it is at least comparable to a very good Western. Not an all time classic, no. But at the least a very good film - regardless of genre IMO, with interesting themes of aging, loss, and regret.
I’m not impressed by the argument which has been raised by some (not Hawke I think) that superhero movies are inevitably constrained by genre. There are many horror films that are routine films, which follow a formulaic path. There are also some from practically every decade of film, from the 20s on, which are all time classics. This is a point incidentally that Hawke recognises in his interview.
Therefore, superhero movies can be more interesting than they typically are. There’s no inevitable constraint in the fact that a protagonist extrudes metal claws from his hands, any more than an antagonist that feeds upon the blood of the living. To that degree, Logan offers a degree of hope that other more interesting movies may emerge from the formulaic fare. Not, I imagine, that the Disney acquisition of Fox will necessarily facilitate this.
Last edited by Coin Biter; 08-28-2018 at 04:55 PM.
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
Eh I don't think Hawke is known for making high art. Many of his films are genre and formulaic but I see his point.
He was at the Locarno Film Festival talking to Rory O'Connor, a film critic. I expect that O'Connor knows who Robert Bresson and Ingmar Bergman are--so Hawke was talking up not down. He probably chose those directors exactly because O'Connor would get the point.
If you don't know who Bresson and Bergman are, here's your chance to look them up on IMDb and see what movies they made. Why are people so afraid to use the internet to find stuff out?
How much money did Transformers make? No thought those were great but they made money because it shut some kid up who wanted to see it or someone who wanted to watch a film.
Films are made to try to make MONEY. Some do it better than others.
No one cares how great (or not) Black Panther is. Box Office is all that matters. It did its job. Sorry Justice League could not.
I don't have anything against Ethan Hawke and I don't take issues with what he thinks of superhero movies, from the sounds of things. I watched a video on Screen Junkies Universe talking about the comments and it sounded like Ethan Hawke made up his mind about Logan before he even watched it, because Logan did not wear tights. I honestly don't think of Logan as that great of a movie. I think it gets too much hype. Hugh Jackman and Patrick Stewart are really good in the movies and it could be argued that one of them may have deserved an acting nomination, but the movie as a whole wasn't all that great.
Find me on Instagram and Twitter - @arfguy
https://whoaskd.com/
So I commented on this elsewhere...a Facebook group maybe. But...this comes off as someone being a stuffy a-hole, to me. I like Hawke. And I love movies (all kinds of movies).
Now...to say something about Logan like he did "Oh I heard it's this great film", etc etc, and "then I saw it and it's not a great movie it's FINE for a superhero movie"
I'm paraphrasing. But what a dick. I mean as an artist...why should he crap all over something other creative people/artists have put together and are proud of?? I mean...I saw Boyhood, and I thought it was "fine" for a really long dramatic film.
it just comes off as sour grapes to me...like "everyone wants to see Iron Man instead of my arty farty film". Sorry dude...
I mean it would be like Hugh Jackman coming out and saying yeah I saw movie X with Ethan Hawke and I was bored out of my mind and fell asleep in it...I guess it was "fine."
Leave the crapping all over someone's work to the critics, dude. When a blockbuster makes a crap-ton of money...it is good for studios who then don't mind putting up some money on smaller films...because they know they will recoup a loss on something when the blockbuster makes a billion dollars.
I love Ethan Hawke. He's always interesting to watch in any role.
Gotta say I agree with him.
Worth remembering that Hawke was more complimentary of superhero films than many superhero fans (myself included on many occasions). Look at what's been said about Man of Steel, Justice League, any iteration of Spider-man, Iron Man 3, etc etc by people who you would expect to be the strongest defenders of the genre.
A cinephile who has probably seen thousands of films doesn’t think a blockbuster genre film is that great.
Oh me, oh my, what a scandal.
———————————————-
Superheroes are lowbrow pulpy American trash. That’s why I love them. I wish people would stop this crusade to make cape stuff respectable.
I get what he is saying. But honestly there are so many outlets for actors now. Netflix, Amazon, Hbo etc ect. Its a golden age for tv. Maybe not movies, but man these guys who want to do serious stuff how so many more ways to do it. Maybe the paychecks are not as big but I am sure they aint hurting. I think the superhero stuff can get a little overwhelming and sometimes overrated at times. I though Black Panther was overrated but really liked the latest avengers. I mean its not just superhero movies plowing over box office its big action movies in general. Jurassic movies, Transformers, or cartoons. There is other good stuff out there if people look. I think most people like to watch the big popcorn stuff in movie theaters, and reserve the other movies for the home.