Your point? Especially if it is Elaine Belloc who confirms this fact that it is to Lucifer that creation is in disequilibrium following its absence. It is a source all the more legitimate since she was the godess of this creation. An easily contradictory point. I would add that not everyone has a "cosmic consciousness" to feel the changes in the structure of reality. So if Elaine Belloc says that this is the case by being the godess of creation, I don't see how it's not the case. I understand your point as follows: EaRtH Is NoT MoViNg BeCeAuSe We DoN't FeEl It. That's how I see your argument that you use agaisnt Lucifer. Dumb exemple on the form, but still...
The example is not related to Lucifer : The destruction of God's creation was only a effect due to the fact that it was God's creation. While the scan in which Lucifer is absent, he exerts an influence in a creation that is not his own having difficulty to adapt. What is impressive feat, do not mind. But nice try : God's feat and Lucifer's feat do not share the same context.
I'm waiting for you to debunk my precedent post, you seem to have time to try to debunk only a part.