Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 45
  1. #16
    Extraordinary Member adrikito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Gotham City
    Posts
    8,091

    Default

    BOTH OPTIONS..

    The last time that I saw Batman&Robin was in Shadow/Ninja Turtless where I saw how I missed them..

    I'm grateful to both series for reunite them again.
    Last edited by adrikito; 09-10-2018 at 10:33 AM.

  2. #17
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    4,154

    Default

    solo or Robin or friendly neighborhood bat or the asshole loner take your pick. ultimately the status quo rules.

  3. #18
    Extraordinary Member CPSparkles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,881

    Default

    Batman and Robin[both volumes] are my favourite anything Batman related. King's arc's with had the boys were my favourite

    The Batman is more fun with family.

  4. #19
    Mighty Member Uncanny Mutie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,389

    Default

    I don't mind either way, but what I DON'T like is Batman stories with third rate sidekicks like The Signal, Bluebird, Batwing, Orphan, etc. trying to fill the Robin role.

    To me, the Batman family is WAY too oversaturated and any Batman sidekicks or "Family" characters outside of Robin, Nightwing, and Batgirl are unnecessary, boring, and automatically take me out of the story. But that's just me...

  5. #20
    Ultimate Member Jackalope89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    10,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncanny Mutie View Post
    I don't mind either way, but what I DON'T like is Batman stories with third rate sidekicks like The Signal, Bluebird, Batwing, Orphan, etc. trying to fill the Robin role.

    To me, the Batman family is WAY too oversaturated and any Batman sidekicks or "Family" characters outside of Robin, Nightwing, and Batgirl are unnecessary, boring, and automatically take me out of the story. But that's just me...
    Except, Orphan WAS a Batgirl at one time. Pre-New52, and was adopted by Bruce at the time as well. New52 took away her adopted status, and time as Batgirl.

  6. #21
    Unstoppable Member KC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,172

    Default

    Depends on the story. Robin and the rest of the Bat-family are great and I love it when they team up with Batman, but some stories work better when Batman is on his own without another hero to help.
    “Somewhere, in our darkest night, we made up the story of a man who will never let us down.”

    - Grant Morrison on Superman

  7. #22
    Ultimate Member SiegePerilous02's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    15,241

    Default

    I like the Bruce and Dick Batman and Robin pairing, and the best way to execute that for me was when Dick was in college. Therefore you have a valid reason for him to float in and out of Bruce's orbit, so they can be partners in one story and we can have a Solo Batman in another.

    So in short, both I guess.

  8. #23
    Incredible Member docmidnite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncanny Mutie View Post
    I don't mind either way, but what I DON'T like is Batman stories with third rate sidekicks like The Signal, Bluebird, Batwing, Orphan, etc. trying to fill the Robin role.

    To me, the Batman family is WAY too oversaturated and any Batman sidekicks or "Family" characters outside of Robin, Nightwing, and Batgirl are unnecessary, boring, and automatically take me out of the story. But that's just me...
    Heh. For me personally, I just hate the term "Bat Family". It's too silly for Batman, IMO and works better with light-hearted characters/concepts like Captain Marvel/SHAZAM.

    I'd prefer them being called the "Outsiders" (since they are all regular people who choose to work "outside" of the law instead of signing up and working within law enforcement) personally.

    Batman and The Outsiders sounds way better than Batman and The "Bat Family" to me, anyway.

  9. #24
    Mighty Member Uncanny Mutie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackalope89 View Post
    Except, Orphan WAS a Batgirl at one time. Pre-New52, and was adopted by Bruce at the time as well. New52 took away her adopted status, and time as Batgirl.
    I know. But she's not Batgirl anymore and as Orphan, has been turned into a very dull, useless, and redundant character. Same as Tim Drake. Dude was my favorite Robin growing up, but he's boring and useless now. So throw him in there with Orphan. Can't stand him either these days. He's technically not Robin anymore, so they don't know WHAT the hell he is or how to use him, yet they keep him around anyway.

  10. #25
    Fantastic Member MarkRodriguez09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Are they called The Bat Family in the actual stories though? I don't think I recall an instance where they're referred as such in canon and not just a fan name or the title of a book or story.

  11. #26
    Ultimate Member Jackalope89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    10,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkRodriguez09 View Post
    Are they called The Bat Family in the actual stories though? I don't think I recall an instance where they're referred as such in canon and not just a fan name or the title of a book or story.
    When discussing what to do about Kate after shooting Clayface, I believe Bruce said to call the Family in for a meeting.

  12. #27
    BANNED Killerbee911's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,814

    Default

    Robin is such a bad concept over a long term period. Batman consistent puts a kid a danger for no real reason. I don't have problem with Robin existing or batman training kids. I do have problem with in non emergency scenario Batman bring a teenagers to fight in life or death situations. Robin should be sparingly used concept. Before someone argues with me remember that a Robin died at the hand of his biggest enemy. How big of an ahole do you have to be after kid dies under your watch to repeat the process again?

    So I guess for me, Batman should be solo and if he has a Robin,It should be someone that he is training that he really doesn't allow in the field.

  13. #28
    Death becomes you Osiris-Rex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    6,857

    Default

    Solo. Never understood why a grown man would put a child in danger or needed a child to help him fight his battles.

  14. #29
    Titans Together!! byrd156's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    9,417

    Default

    Man I really just don't get this whole Batman thing. Don't understand why some rich dude beats up on crazy and poor people.
    "It's too bad she won't live! But then again, who does? - Gaff Blade Runner

    "In a short time, this will be a long time ago." - Werner Slow West

    "One of the biggest problems in the industry is apathy right now." - Dan Didio Co-Publisher of I Wonder Why That Is Comics

  15. #30
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    1,199

    Default

    Yeah, you can poke holes at the concept of mental illness in Batman comics, you can poke holes at the concept of Batman.
    Lets not bring real life arguments in to this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •