View Poll Results: Are Kid Superheroes A Morally Wrong Idea?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    5 25.00%
  • No

    15 75.00%
  • I Don't Know

    0 0%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    34,095

    Default Are Kid Superheroes A Morally Reprehensible Concept?

    Kid superheroes have gotten a bit of criticism. Namely, people find it irresponsible and dangerous for kids to be in such situations. This criticism was especially common after the death of Jason Todd.

    What are your views on this? Are kid superheroes wrong or acceptable?

  2. #2
    Astonishing Member Kusanagi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    Depends on the circumstances, tone, and genre really.

    Most kid heroes are aimed at younger audiences and it's just entertaining fantasy. I don't think anyone is saying Ben 10 or Steven Universe are morally reprehensible for example.

    The Robins are a bit different in that the the bat verse is typically darker than your average kid setting, and they (for the most part) don't have any powers. So instead of having fantastic powers fighting against outlandish and sometimes comical villains they're fighting Serial Killers and mass murders with a pair of tights and a gadget belt.
    Last edited by Kusanagi; 10-15-2018 at 06:12 AM.
    Current Pull: Amazing Spider-Man and Domino

    Bunn for Deadpool's Main Book!

  3. #3
    Invincible Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    20,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kusanagi View Post
    Depends on the circumstances, tone, and genre really.

    Most kid heroes are aimed at younger audiences and it's just entertaining fantasy. I don't think anyone is saying Ben 10 or Steven Universe are morally reprehensible for example.

    The Robins are a bit different in that the the bat verse is typically darker than your average kid setting, and they (for the most part) don't have any powers. So instead of having fantastic powers fighting against outlandish and sometimes comical villains they're fighting Serial Killers and mass murders with a pair of tights and a gadget belt.
    That's pretty much how I feel. In more light-hearted stories I don't think it's an issue, but when it's a "grim dark" Punisher/Batman story then it gets problematic.

  4. #4
    Extraordinary Member kjn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    4,875

    Default

    Then you basically have to level the same criticism against basically all of children's literature, where kids facing dangerous situations are a staple. There can be a valid criticism on these grounds in those stories that are aimed at adults, like Frank Miller's All Star Batman and Robin, but that story is (as I see it) more validly critiqued for attempting to critique the Batman mythos and doing a poor job of it.

    In either case, kids have always been self-inserting themselves into stories, and I see nothing wrong with that or in crafting stories built around that practice.

  5. #5
    Uncanny Member MajorHoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    29,974

    Default

    It depends on how old you are defining "kid heroes" and many other things.
    Kid sidekicks were a big thing dating back to the Golden Age, but in the later part of the 20th century they became less common and often went from "kid" more towards their late-teens.

    Also depends if the "kid" hero is independently operating or a mere sidekick/extension of an adult hero.

    And when you say "a morally reprehensible concept", are you talking about the publisher / writer being the one who's acting in a "morally reprehensible" manner, or are the people who buy/support the books the ones at fault?

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    34,095

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorHoy View Post
    It depends on how old you are defining "kid heroes" and many other things.
    Kid sidekicks were a big thing dating back to the Golden Age, but in the later part of the 20th century they became less common and often went from "kid" more towards their late-teens.

    Also depends if the "kid" hero is independently operating or a mere sidekick/extension of an adult hero.

    And when you say "a morally reprehensible concept", are you talking about the publisher / writer being the one who's acting in a "morally reprehensible" manner, or are the people who buy/support the books the ones at fault?
    I meant is it a morally reprehensible thing for the stories to support.

  7. #7
    Old school comic book fan WestPhillyPunisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    31,492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kusanagi View Post
    Depends on the circumstances, tone, and genre really.

    Most kid heroes are aimed at younger audiences and it's just entertaining fantasy. I don't think anyone is saying Ben 10 or Steven Universe are morally reprehensible for example.
    And over in Japan, kid superheroes have been all the rage for decades, thanks to the likes of Sailor Moon, Pretty Cure, Strike Witches and boatloads more.
    Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!

  8. #8
    Uncanny Member MajorHoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    29,974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Z View Post
    I meant is it a morally reprehensible thing for the stories to support.
    So, who might be morally responsible for that?

  9. #9
    Astonishing Member Tuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    3,875

    Default

    This is one of those questions like, "are secret identities obsolete?" or "should Batman, Superman, Spider-Man kill people?" that is a fundamental failure to buy in to the foundations of superhero comics. The question is fine for a deconstruction, but otherwise it's seeking out the strings.

  10. #10

    Default

    I think it is all right to have kid superheroes.
    After all, kids are mini adults.

  11. #11
    Uncanny Member MajorHoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    29,974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zetsubou View Post
    It is not okay for child soldiers to fight in Africa or the Middle East, but it is okay for Bucky, Robin, Marvel's Young Allies, DC's The Boy Commandos, and other kid superheroes to fight Nazis?
    You do realize those American examples were from nearly eighty years ago? Times were different then. The stories back then were generally aimed at the younger audience, and how many kids back in those days dreamed / imagined they could do something to help in the effort against the Axis forces?
    Also, were those kids forced against their wills to participate in the fighting, or did they chose to do so?

  12. #12
    Invincible Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    20,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kjn View Post
    Then you basically have to level the same criticism against basically all of children's literature, where kids facing dangerous situations are a staple. There can be a valid criticism on these grounds in those stories that are aimed at adults, like Frank Miller's All Star Batman and Robin, but that story is (as I see it) more validly critiqued for attempting to critique the Batman mythos and doing a poor job of it.

    In either case, kids have always been self-inserting themselves into stories, and I see nothing wrong with that or in crafting stories built around that practice.
    I don't think the problem is with teens/kids being superheroes per se or having stories where they might be in danger. It's more taking the golden-age approach to kid sidekicks and then trying to do overly "realistic" stories using the same trope. Batman looks really irresponsible taking 12yr olds into street fights with mobsters and drug dealers when viewed through realistic eyes.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zetsubou View Post
    It is not okay for child soldiers to fight in Africa or the Middle East, but it is okay for Bucky, Robin, Marvel's Young Allies, DC's The Boy Commandos, and other kid superheroes to fight Nazis?
    There is a difference between real life and comics. You do know that comics are fiction, right?

  14. #14
    Astonishing Member Tuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    3,875

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zetsubou View Post
    It is not okay for child soldiers to fight in Africa or the Middle East, but it is okay for Bucky, Robin, Marvel's Young Allies, DC's The Boy Commandos, and other kid superheroes to fight Nazis?
    Comic Book Nazis can's aim for ****.

  15. #15
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    3,375

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zetsubou View Post
    It is not okay for child soldiers to fight in Africa or the Middle East, but it is okay for Bucky, Robin, Marvel's Young Allies, DC's The Boy Commandos, and other kid superheroes to fight Nazis?
    The original X-Men were basically child soldiers conscripted by Xavier

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •