Quote Originally Posted by Star_Jammer View Post
We already have enough continuity questions regarding "When does this book happen vs. when this book happened" (most recent example: Death of Inhumans vs. Fantastic Four), I think expecting all (or even most) major events from books to be referenced in other books would just add to the confusion*...so much so, it's just easier to assume that reason the Avengers didn't help the Fantastic Four is because the Avengers were just busy, not that they're apathetic.

But some people like to assume the worst. /shrug
I haven't argued that readers can't make meta-sense of "the Avengers aren't here because they're also superheroes and can't be everywhere at once", I'm not sure why you keep assuming the worst of my point-of-view or argument. I didn't say "all" or "even most" or that it needed to be constant and X-fans weren't the ones who raised the question of where the Avengers are when the X-Men could use their help - it was Marvel. They chose to make a deal out of it, they chose to have the teams antagonize each other, and they chose to have the X-Men be mistreated in and out of the comics.

I might agree with some of the sentiments expressed by my more ardent peers, but that doesn't mean I agree with every point made; I don't think that the Avengers are apathetic, but I'm wary of interactions between most teams because Marvel hasn't instilled in me confidence that they can juggle those narratives and characters successfully. The most recent example is in X-Men Red, where the Avengers arrive to lend Jean and her team a hand against Cassandra, and you know what? I disliked plenty of other things in the issue, but their inclusion there made narrative sense - it wasn't a masterpiece move, but it was good use of the characters without interrupting any major narratives.

Quote Originally Posted by Star_Jammer View Post
I agree, it would be cool if continuity was super-tight, and Marvel could coordinate every major event to the Nth degree...but I doubt it's fun, or even possible. Knowing exactly what the X-Men were doing while Kang was conquering the world, and why the X-Men didn't help would've been awesome.

The idea seems better/easier than the reality though, IMO.
They don't need to coordinate to the Nth degree, I hope you don't believe that I think that, but any improvement in Marvel's editorial oversight would be refreshing.

Quote Originally Posted by Star_Jammer View Post
*Not to mention stifling creativity a bit. "You...Avengers writer...you HAVE to reference this X-Event in this specific issue, or the fans will riot!"
That's a bit of an exaggeration, don't you think? Maybe it's not too much to ask that editors work together so there isn't minor contradictions across books? Maybe it's not too much to ask that Marvel not ignore character and team histories because it's convenient for them? That's kind of editorial's job.