Nope, Scott was 15 years old.
Nope, Scott was 15 years old.
Well, yes, he was 15.
thats a retcon since Bobby was originally the youngest at 16, but yeah definitely Scott definitely was not 15
Yes, Scott was 15 years old.
Scott can't be 15 if Bobby is the youngest at 16. But writers aren't paying close attention to continuity or to ages (which slide around under the best of circumstances). Now we know even the best of writers have been infected by Bendis' 'Screw Continuity' mentality - it's a company wide problem.
I thought it meant Scott was the first x-man and was alone with Xavier for some time before he recruited the other original xmen
And yet, he was 15 years old.
If we ignore Scott's retcons, we can talk about the other O5.
Exactly. He was with Xavier for awhile before the entire team assembled. By that time he was at least 18 and that was the age he was when he first appeared in All New X-men, but his appearance in his solo title contradicts that. Given the time jumps and everything thats happened, I think its safe to say he's about 18-19 now.
No, he was 15 when he came from the past. And he must be 16 to 17 by now.
Can we just say it was Reed's fault somehow? Either that or just Editorial for not keeping score.
Le Suck it, Dolphin!
-God I am so tired.
SCOTT SUMMERS AND EMMA FROST DESERVED BETTER.