Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 141
  1. #16
    Extraordinary Member CRaymond's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    5,733

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExodusCloak View Post
    Also the current X-Men roster is too homogeneous in personality
    QFT

    Give me more unique perspectives with regard to mutancy and power and goals. More Emma, more Gambit, more Rachel.

  2. #17
    Mighty Member Uncanny Mutie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExodusCloak View Post
    You can have a roster of ten over 3 books but if you only want to tell stories where one character does everything you're still going to fall into the same problem. Not too many X-Men but no X-Men team books with rehashing the same nostalgia crap over and over

    Really some characters aren't interesting enough to hold a series where they do everything and there lies the problem looking at you Red, Gold and Blue. There meant to be team books not solos

    Also the current X-Men roster is too homogeneous in personality
    I know EXACTLY what you mean. X-Men Red is the perfect example: On paper, the book had a very nice roster/mix of X-Men, but they all went to waste because it pretty much got treated like a bland, run of the mill, adult Jean solo book. You had the popular/experienced A list X-Men (Jean, Storm, Nightcrawler, Gambit, even Namor) and your younger, newer characters (X-23/Gabby, Gentle, and a brand new character in Trinary), but they all ended up wallpaper for a boring, super decompressed story where Jean became the focal point of the entire series. And sorry, but Jean has never been interesting enough for a solo title, so even though she is an A-list X-Men TEAM member, you should have known that wasn't going to work).

  3. #18
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncanny Mutie View Post
    I know EXACTLY what you mean. X-Men Red is the perfect example: On paper, the book had a very nice roster/mix of X-Men, but they all went to waste because it pretty much got treated like a bland, run of the mill, adult Jean solo book. You had the popular/experienced A list X-Men (Jean, Storm, Nightcrawler, Gambit, even Namor) and your younger, newer characters (X-23/Gabby, Gentle, and a brand new character in Trinary), but they all ended up wallpaper for a boring, super decompressed story where Jean became the focal point of the entire series. And sorry, but Jean has never been interesting enough for a solo title, so even though she is an A-list X-Men TEAM member, you should have known that wasn't going to work).
    Absolutely agree

  4. #19
    Goddess_In_Real_Life Goddess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    New JerZ. You KNOW something! Tell me what you know!
    Posts
    724

    Default

    The core X-Men is everyone from the Gold & Blue team circa 1991 w/ Nightcrawler, Kitty, Emma and others more as secondary tier.

    Sure you have newer mains like X-23 and Magik but they aren't core.

    Also, Storm is not more essential than Cyclops since most of the iconic stories evolve around him, his love life, his children and his daddy issues and the weeds that sprout from said roots. Cyclops is more important to the X-Mythos than Storm who is important as an identifier but not in the realm of the narrative (relative to Scott, I mean; she's still core like the others circa 1991).

    Also, why is Kwannon being mentioned in the OP with the core characters? Psylocke is core regardless which body she occupies, not Kwannon.
    Author of X-Forums.

    Follow Goddess on Instagram.

  5. #20
    THE NEW X-MEN SQUAD 924COLLECTIVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    GENOSHA
    Posts
    1,618

    Default

    Would be happy with a core line-up of: UNCANNY X-MEN, X-MEN, NEW-X-MEN, and EXILES (for those What If? /Alternate reality adventures)

    For goodness sakes, just put some top tier writers and artists on the books, and give the artists enough time to finish a complete arc without
    having to hand off issues to a 2nd/ 3rd tier filler artist because of time constraints PLEASE & NO CROSSOVERS for a solid two years minimum.
    924COLLECTIVE IS GETTING THE NEW X-MEN SQUAD BACK TOGETHER: ANOLE, DUST, ELIXIR, GENTLE, HELLION, PIXIE, PRODIGY, SURGE, THE STEPFORD CUCKOOS , & X-23.

  6. #21
    Mighty Member Uncanny Mutie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goddess View Post
    The core X-Men is everyone from the Gold & Blue team circa 1991 w/ Nightcrawler, Kitty, Emma and others more as secondary tier.
    Right. I don't know how/why more X-Men fans don't understand that. I think Nightcrawler and Kitty are arguably first tier, and that Emma is best as a villain, but definitely agree that the 90's Blue and Gold team pretty much are the core/a-list X-Men, which is why they merged all of them together in the first place when they came up with the concept of Blue and Gold teams.

  7. #22
    Ultimate Member Wiccan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    12,931

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoop Dogg View Post
    Jean Grey is the only character in fiction privileged enough to be absent for like 25 years of a franchise that's about 55 years old and still be considered core.
    Her absence on those years has influenced the direction of the franchise more than some character's presence have at the same time-frame lol.

  8. #23
    Mighty Member blinkingblah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncanny Mutie View Post
    I know EXACTLY what you mean. X-Men Red is the perfect example: On paper, the book had a very nice roster/mix of X-Men, but they all went to waste because it pretty much got treated like a bland, run of the mill, adult Jean solo book. You had the popular/experienced A list X-Men (Jean, Storm, Nightcrawler, Gambit, even Namor) and your younger, newer characters (X-23/Gabby, Gentle, and a brand new character in Trinary), but they all ended up wallpaper for a boring, super decompressed story where Jean became the focal point of the entire series. And sorry, but Jean has never been interesting enough for a solo title, so even though she is an A-list X-Men TEAM member, you should have known that wasn't going to work).
    Wow never even thought about it that way but you are 100 percent correct. They focused way too much on Jean and not everybody. I feel like if they were given another 78 issues with this same roster than we might be singing a different tune.

  9. #24
    Fantastic Member thechronic92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    495

    Default

    An identifiable roster won't magically make the books better. What's holding the X-Men books back is the writing and editing.

  10. #25
    THE NEW X-MEN SQUAD 924COLLECTIVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    GENOSHA
    Posts
    1,618

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blinkingblah View Post
    Wow never even thought about it that way but you are 100 percent correct. They focused way too much on Jean and not everybody. I feel like if they were given another 78 issues with this same roster than we might be singing a different tune.
    Each character on the team had their moments to shine. Unlike this current Uncanny Re-boot where everything is just generic lines and throwaway action.
    924COLLECTIVE IS GETTING THE NEW X-MEN SQUAD BACK TOGETHER: ANOLE, DUST, ELIXIR, GENTLE, HELLION, PIXIE, PRODIGY, SURGE, THE STEPFORD CUCKOOS , & X-23.

  11. #26
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,516

    Default

    Have to agree that the problem is not the roster.

    A Peter David could make a bunch of d-tiers interesting and a great book around them. A Guggenheim would take great characters who should write themselves and make them boring and unlikeable.

  12. #27
    Mighty Member Uncanny Mutie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 924COLLECTIVE View Post
    Each character on the team had their moments to shine.
    Ah, yes. The obligatory, super-brief "moment to shine," right before they become wallpaper for the rest of the series...lol.

    Quote Originally Posted by 924COLLECTIVE View Post
    Unlike this current Uncanny Re-boot where everything is just generic lines and throwaway action.
    Have to agree. The Uncanny reboot has been even WORSE than Red. I guess we should have known it would be bland, generic, and directionless from all the solicits and art teases showing an undefined roster of 3,000 different random X-Men.

  13. #28
    Mighty Member Uncanny Mutie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sunofdarkchild View Post
    Have to agree that the problem is not the roster.

    A Peter David could make a bunch of d-tiers interesting and a great book around them. A Guggenheim would take great characters who should write themselves and make them boring and unlikeable.
    Amen to that!!!! The roster still helps, though, if we are talking about the MAIN X-Men team(s) and getting them back to the place where they were commercially and critically. Even the Avengers roster that they used for the MCU movies consisted of mostly heavy hitters and A-List Avengers, and just look at how popular the Avengers are now, even to people who don't read the comics.

  14. #29
    Fantastic Member Criticalfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Michigan, US
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Morrison's roster (but with only Jean OR Emma) is the equivalent of the Avengers' Trinity. Or the roster from the 1st movie. (Storm for beast). That's the core.

    The roster question is basically:
    A) one "flagship" book starring them, then the rest

    B) split the core into 90s blue/Gold type books whose rosters are filled out by the 2nd tier/B+/A- types, (necessitating 2 established quality editor/writer/art teams), then the rest
    Last edited by Criticalfan; 12-17-2018 at 02:48 PM. Reason: Clarity, Spelling

  15. #30

    Default

    I agree the most popular X-Men are the 90's Blue and Gold teams and Nightcrawler and Kitty. The core for me are: Wolverine, Storm, Cyclops, Jean Grey and Professor X.

    We really need a bigger, long game plan for the X-Men books. The ever changing rosters and small stories feel superficial and not important.

    My ideal rosters:

    Uncanny X-Men:
    Storm - leader
    Wolverine
    Nightcrawler
    Psylocke
    Northstar
    Colossus
    Jubilee

    X-Men:
    Jean Grey - leader
    Cyclops
    Bishop
    Iceman
    Armor
    Gambit
    Rogue

    X-Force:
    Cable - leader
    Domino
    Shattestar
    Feral
    Deadpool
    X-23
    Kwannon

    Excalibur:
    Captain Britain - leader
    Meggan
    Pixie
    Pete Wisdom
    Chamber
    Rachel Grey

    X-Factor:
    Multiple Man - leader
    M
    Polaris
    Strong Guy
    Rictor
    Hepzibah

    Professor X, Beast, Forge, Dr.Reyes and Kitty Pryde are based at the school and are supporting characters.
    Last edited by MentalManipulator; 12-17-2018 at 02:58 PM.
    A picture would last longer darling...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •