I know EXACTLY what you mean. X-Men Red is the perfect example: On paper, the book had a very nice roster/mix of X-Men, but they all went to waste because it pretty much got treated like a bland, run of the mill, adult Jean solo book. You had the popular/experienced A list X-Men (Jean, Storm, Nightcrawler, Gambit, even Namor) and your younger, newer characters (X-23/Gabby, Gentle, and a brand new character in Trinary), but they all ended up wallpaper for a boring, super decompressed story where Jean became the focal point of the entire series. And sorry, but Jean has never been interesting enough for a solo title, so even though she is an A-list X-Men TEAM member, you should have known that wasn't going to work).
The core X-Men is everyone from the Gold & Blue team circa 1991 w/ Nightcrawler, Kitty, Emma and others more as secondary tier.
Sure you have newer mains like X-23 and Magik but they aren't core.
Also, Storm is not more essential than Cyclops since most of the iconic stories evolve around him, his love life, his children and his daddy issues and the weeds that sprout from said roots. Cyclops is more important to the X-Mythos than Storm who is important as an identifier but not in the realm of the narrative (relative to Scott, I mean; she's still core like the others circa 1991).
Also, why is Kwannon being mentioned in the OP with the core characters? Psylocke is core regardless which body she occupies, not Kwannon.
Would be happy with a core line-up of: UNCANNY X-MEN, X-MEN, NEW-X-MEN, and EXILES (for those What If? /Alternate reality adventures)
For goodness sakes, just put some top tier writers and artists on the books, and give the artists enough time to finish a complete arc without
having to hand off issues to a 2nd/ 3rd tier filler artist because of time constraints PLEASE & NO CROSSOVERS for a solid two years minimum.
924COLLECTIVE IS GETTING THE NEW X-MEN SQUAD BACK TOGETHER: ANOLE, DUST, ELIXIR, GENTLE, HELLION, PIXIE, PRODIGY, SURGE, THE STEPFORD CUCKOOS , & X-23.
Right. I don't know how/why more X-Men fans don't understand that. I think Nightcrawler and Kitty are arguably first tier, and that Emma is best as a villain, but definitely agree that the 90's Blue and Gold team pretty much are the core/a-list X-Men, which is why they merged all of them together in the first place when they came up with the concept of Blue and Gold teams.
An identifiable roster won't magically make the books better. What's holding the X-Men books back is the writing and editing.
924COLLECTIVE IS GETTING THE NEW X-MEN SQUAD BACK TOGETHER: ANOLE, DUST, ELIXIR, GENTLE, HELLION, PIXIE, PRODIGY, SURGE, THE STEPFORD CUCKOOS , & X-23.
Have to agree that the problem is not the roster.
A Peter David could make a bunch of d-tiers interesting and a great book around them. A Guggenheim would take great characters who should write themselves and make them boring and unlikeable.
Ah, yes. The obligatory, super-brief "moment to shine," right before they become wallpaper for the rest of the series...lol.
Have to agree. The Uncanny reboot has been even WORSE than Red. I guess we should have known it would be bland, generic, and directionless from all the solicits and art teases showing an undefined roster of 3,000 different random X-Men.
Amen to that!!!! The roster still helps, though, if we are talking about the MAIN X-Men team(s) and getting them back to the place where they were commercially and critically. Even the Avengers roster that they used for the MCU movies consisted of mostly heavy hitters and A-List Avengers, and just look at how popular the Avengers are now, even to people who don't read the comics.
Morrison's roster (but with only Jean OR Emma) is the equivalent of the Avengers' Trinity. Or the roster from the 1st movie. (Storm for beast). That's the core.
The roster question is basically:
A) one "flagship" book starring them, then the rest
B) split the core into 90s blue/Gold type books whose rosters are filled out by the 2nd tier/B+/A- types, (necessitating 2 established quality editor/writer/art teams), then the rest
Last edited by Criticalfan; 12-17-2018 at 02:48 PM. Reason: Clarity, Spelling
I agree the most popular X-Men are the 90's Blue and Gold teams and Nightcrawler and Kitty. The core for me are: Wolverine, Storm, Cyclops, Jean Grey and Professor X.
We really need a bigger, long game plan for the X-Men books. The ever changing rosters and small stories feel superficial and not important.
My ideal rosters:
Uncanny X-Men:
Storm - leader
Wolverine
Nightcrawler
Psylocke
Northstar
Colossus
Jubilee
X-Men:
Jean Grey - leader
Cyclops
Bishop
Iceman
Armor
Gambit
Rogue
X-Force:
Cable - leader
Domino
Shattestar
Feral
Deadpool
X-23
Kwannon
Excalibur:
Captain Britain - leader
Meggan
Pixie
Pete Wisdom
Chamber
Rachel Grey
X-Factor:
Multiple Man - leader
M
Polaris
Strong Guy
Rictor
Hepzibah
Professor X, Beast, Forge, Dr.Reyes and Kitty Pryde are based at the school and are supporting characters.
Last edited by MentalManipulator; 12-17-2018 at 02:58 PM.
A picture would last longer darling...