Originally Posted by
SebastianS
I have seen people complaining about those characters (or certain iteration of those characters) too. I guess it all depends on personal preferences. For example, while I admit that for most of his recent history Batman has been ... well, Batgod, I prefer whenever he is actually more of a detective, and less of a all time strategist/brawler. To me, Bruce is a mix of Zorro and Sherlock Holmes. And Superman, for as much as he always see the best in everyone, seems to resort to his fist more often than not. But perhaps it is the medium, which doesn't allow for a different type of stories in a monthly format.
Which leads to my preference over the 90s heroes, with that mix of "FRIENDS" and daily struggle added to their superheroics.
Speaking of Hal, I think that whenever I call him bland, it is because the characteristics you mentioned, in Hal, don't add to anything new. I guess it is hard to pinpoint, exactly, because I do like the character, and I think there is AMAZING untapped potential, and hence, why I think the last 15 years Hal is a bland Hal.