Page 143 of 193 FirstFirst ... 4393133139140141142143144145146147153 ... LastLast
Results 2,131 to 2,145 of 2882
  1. #2131
    Tyrant Sun User leokearon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Waterford, Ireland
    Posts
    2,173

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaximoffTrash View Post
    It still keeps the part that Wanda was born on Wundagore which the Robinson run changed.(Changing her birthplace that is, then of course this can be Wanda snatched later by HE than her just born.)
    Exactly it doesn't re-retcon Robertson's run, Wanda is just mentioned as an infant not a newborn,
    Check out my Deviantart Page: http://leokearon.deviantart.com/

    Vote for your favourite Marvel Supporting Characters: http://community.comicbookresources....ing-characters

  2. #2132
    Keeper of the Torch Ravin' Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Where the Diwatas and the Triumph Division live
    Posts
    5,674

    Default

    Wanda on Mark Brooks' cover of (Dark) Captain Marvel #12 in November. I hope it's not a misdirection and she will be in the story.



    https://www.cbr.com/captain-marvel-evil-carol-danvers/
    Human Torch/Fantastic Four/She-Hulk/Disney Big Hero 6 fanatic, Avatar-maker, and Marvel Moderator
    "一人じゃないから。" AI、『Story』。
    "ヒロ、お前を信じてる。" タダシ、『ベイマックス』。
    Know the CBR Community STANDARDS & RULES

  3. #2133
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,639

    Default

    Well, at least Kelly Thompson remembered she is an Avenger when she is round up fellow heroes for Carol to beat up.
    I don't have much faith in the writer or Marvel Editorial in general to remember the Wanda/Carol relationship though, so I just expect it to be like Wanda's recent appearance in DS with an "Oh no".
    But it's a nice cover by Mark Brook, that's a win for Wanda at least.

    I am okay with Wanda just being like classic She-Hulk as a cover only to be honest.
    Last edited by MaximoffTrash; 08-22-2019 at 06:15 AM.

  4. #2134
    Astonishing Member Phoenixx9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    4,806

    Default

    Liking Wanda's shiny, almost metallic-appearing tiara.

  5. #2135
    Fantastic Member Probability010's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Prague
    Posts
    309

    Default

    I always imagine her Tiara being metal.
    Yet specifically for Cosplay I guess one wouldn’t try to attach something that weights about 1 kg

  6. #2136
    Tyrant Sun User leokearon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Waterford, Ireland
    Posts
    2,173

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Probability010 View Post
    I always imagine her Tiara being metal.
    Yet specifically for Cosplay I guess one wouldn’t try to attach something that weights about 1 kg
    It probably is made out of something tough, I never seen it being damaged
    Check out my Deviantart Page: http://leokearon.deviantart.com/

    Vote for your favourite Marvel Supporting Characters: http://community.comicbookresources....ing-characters

  7. #2137
    Astonishing Member Phoenixx9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    4,806

    Default

    I think originally it was thick costumed material, when it went around her entire head.

    Then it changed to stiffened costumed material as the tiara.

    Later on, rigid non-cloth material.

    Now, metal.

    At least, that is one possible take on it, lol.

  8. #2138
    Tyrant Sun User leokearon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Waterford, Ireland
    Posts
    2,173

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenixx9 View Post
    I think originally it was thick costumed material, when it went around her entire head.

    Then it changed to stiffened costumed material as the tiara.

    Later on, rigid non-cloth material.

    Now, metal.

    At least, that is one possible take on it, lol.
    Maybe it's unstable molecules
    Check out my Deviantart Page: http://leokearon.deviantart.com/

    Vote for your favourite Marvel Supporting Characters: http://community.comicbookresources....ing-characters

  9. #2139
    Fantastic Member Probability010's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Prague
    Posts
    309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaximoffTrash View Post
    Well, at least Kelly Thompson remembered she is an Avenger when she is round up fellow heroes for Carol to beat up.
    I don't have much faith in the writer or Marvel Editorial in general to remember the Wanda/Carol relationship though,
    I don’t even have faith in how they will treat Carol. One of the alternate covers looks a bit like the dusting Avengers logo from the “Endgame” promo, but it also reminds me on the infamous picture of Wanda’s disintegrating head that was made for HoM. This here is a typical “all hero’s got beaten up” cover, which also brings bad memories from “Secret Empire” (I am not sure if I was on this forum back than already). The only good thing that had for me was that I found it hilarious that to me it looked more like Wanda was taking a sunbath. Some of the Characters shown there did not appear in that comic. And I guess I don’t have to remind anyone that practically only Wanda’s body was present. She was only herself in the very last picture, concluding the event without having said a single word on her own.
    Sooo ...

    Quote Originally Posted by MaximoffTrash View Post
    so I just expect it to be like Wanda's recent appearance in DS with an "Oh no".
    But it's a nice cover by Mark Brook, that's a win for Wanda at least.
    I’m afraid you are expecting too much.


    Quote Originally Posted by MaximoffTrash View Post
    I am okay with Wanda just being like classic She-Hulk as a cover only to be honest.
    I wouldn’t wanna say which region to look for, but I am rather sure that’s her recent costume
    Only the Tiara is the classic one once again.

  10. #2140
    Tyrant Sun User leokearon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Waterford, Ireland
    Posts
    2,173

    Default

    https://www.cbr.com/marvel-wandavisi...e-mutants-mcu/

    Another ill-informed reverse HOM theory, Yawn
    Check out my Deviantart Page: http://leokearon.deviantart.com/

    Vote for your favourite Marvel Supporting Characters: http://community.comicbookresources....ing-characters

  11. #2141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leokearon View Post
    https://www.cbr.com/marvel-wandavisi...e-mutants-mcu/

    Another ill-informed reverse HOM theory, Yawn
    CBR keeps doing this and they should know better. As a comics website they should have read more of the character to know what would likely be used. It's disappointing.
    Was Curlytop

  12. #2142
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    I'm so bored from all these months of nothing that even seeing Wanda on a cover is good, but yeah, Mark Brooks did a "Secret Empire" cover that was almost exactly the same - an evil version of a familiar character surrounded by unconscious heroes. Wanda was on that cover too and she did literally nothing in the issue or the series.

    I do notice that on that cover Brooks was still drawing the jeweled tiara. It's probably gone for good (I didn't like it, I know others did).


  13. #2143
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,639

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Probability010 View Post
    I don’t even have faith in how they will treat Carol. One of the alternate covers looks a bit like the dusting Avengers logo from the “Endgame” promo, but it also reminds me on the infamous picture of Wanda’s disintegrating head that was made for HoM. This here is a typical “all hero’s got beaten up” cover, which also brings bad memories from “Secret Empire” (I am not sure if I was on this forum back than already). The only good thing that had for me was that I found it hilarious that to me it looked more like Wanda was taking a sunbath. Some of the Characters shown there did not appear in that comic. And I guess I don’t have to remind anyone that practically only Wanda’s body was present. She was only herself in the very last picture, concluding the event without having said a single word on her own.
    Sooo ...



    I’m afraid you are expecting too much.



    I wouldn’t wanna say which region to look for, but I am rather sure that’s her recent costume
    Only the Tiara is the classic one once again.
    I meant "being cover only", not "wearing her classic costume on cover", clearly Jen is not going back to her normal/classic self in this issue. Meaning Wanda won't appear in this issue just like classic Jen won't.

  14. #2144
    Astonishing Member Phoenixx9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    4,806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leokearon View Post
    Maybe it's unstable molecules
    Naw, just my take on her classic tiara appearances.

  15. #2145
    Fantastic Member Probability010's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Prague
    Posts
    309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaximoffTrash View Post
    I meant "being cover only", not "wearing her classic costume on cover", clearly Jen is not going back to her normal/classic self in this issue. Meaning Wanda won't appear in this issue just like classic Jen won't.
    Oh, okay, than I obviously completely misunderstood what you were trying to say. Concluding that way that Wanda and/or Jen will not be in that issue is quite a stretch, I’d think. I myself rather keep it simple and go with well-trained pessimism.


    Quote Originally Posted by gurkle View Post

    [...]

    I do notice that on that cover Brooks was still drawing the jeweled tiara. It's probably gone for good (I didn't like it, I know others did).

    [...]
    I guess many like that one, me included. It might be different though for the ones who have to draw it


    Quote Originally Posted by GenericUsername View Post
    CBR keeps doing this and they should know better. As a comics website they should have read more of the character to know what would likely be used. It's disappointing.
    Also these Geniuses say HoM was 2015. I reaaaly thought that was longer ago ...

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •