Not really, but feel free to think that.
I'll admit I was surprised that a) she had any kind of appearance in HoX/PoX and b) (supposedly) X-Men #1 will use her, but neither has made me rethink my expectations as a whole. My experience to date has been one where Marvel appears to give her something as cover for screwing her some other way. Prime example #1 being how they permitted Lorna interacting with Wanda and Pietro as siblings on ANXF as cover for the soon-to-come Axis retcon. Prime example #2 being how Secret Wars: House of M gave her a good presence and lots of cameos as cover for the next two years of nothing.
In the past, I used to perceive apparently good moments as signs that Marvel was trying to improve and treat her better. Marvel's taught me that I was wrong to put that kind of faith in them on multiple occasions over the past 10 years.
I also wonder what the turn-around time for script to art to publish is. Because that turn-around time can mean the difference between "we already had plans for Lorna and you just judged it too soon" and "let's change this character here to Polaris because fans are asking for her." Lamenting the nature of humans and then hearing a man philosophize about evolution doesn't require having history with the man, after all. Current usage has been entirely interchangeable with just about any other character Marvel has.