Originally Posted by
XPac
I think by minimizing Wakanda, it sort of gives Coogler more freedom to pretty much take Wakanda in whatever direction he wants for the next film rather than incorporating any bits of it we see in the Avengers movie. A pretty big shake up occured in Wakanda (and everywhere else in the universe for that matter), and Coogler MIGHT wanna use that, or he might not. Getting next to nothing means Coogler can deal with it any way he wants, or even to essentially ignore the Avengers stuff.
I remember the Aquaman movie basically having to ignore everything we saw of Atlantis in the Justice League movie for example as it didn't fit the direction they were going. For this sort of thing, less can be a good thing.