yep to all that.
So Black Panther needs a full stop...
Get Hectic!
well...
like i always say. different writers will want to do different things.
and it's why the odds are so high i'll never get my hands on that book.
Do you think that Marvel would rather T'Challa go through continual deconstruction and your story ventures away from that os the reason? I mean between priest, Hudlin, liss etc. The stories are all different, and we see different aspects of T'Challa yet he still keeps his core traits. What makes you so different that they wouldn't even consider you? If they are letting Coates run unchecked as he is on the mythos I don't see why you couldn't have your take, especially since it appears you would bring him and Wakanda back to status quo and then elevate from there
Between Ramomda, Storm, and even Monica Lynn (who was engaged even though they didn't actually marry), I think the ship has sort of sailed as far as rejection of outsider queens without a whole lot of retconning.
White Wolf sort of goes against that too. Sort of.
I don't doubt that some might be against it. But if that's what the king wants, there doesn't seem to be much anyone can do about it.
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother
I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Interested in reading Daredevil? Not sure what to read next? Why not check out the Daredevil Book Club for some ideas?
I think it's because Marvel has never known what, exactly, they want from BP. This means any creator with a STRONG and thought out POV can probably sway them to any new direction so long as they feel the creator knows where they're going and won't break the toys.
for me, I'd try to keep aspects of all the stories that came before but the portrayal of Wakanda's history and social structure needs a massive edit and a consistency that won't change with each new writer (unless that change IS the story).
as a writer (as opposed to a guy who reads and collects these things which is what I mostly am when it comes to comics) i feel this lack of editorial direction has given creators a lot of freedom but has sacrificed T'Challa as a KNOWN commodity. My goal would be to tie all the previous versions into single cohesive whole. that means cutting everything that doesn't match and solidifying the rest.
there's a difference between coming in to take a dump one what the previous writer did and coming in to do your own thing.
If Marvel ever does a hard reboot, I'd want to come in after that with something new. ANAD BP.
So both Monica and storm would be out, for instance (as permanent partners) but they'd still be present as parts of his romantic history. Killmonger would be in but, sadly, MOVIE KM doesn't work for me in the 616 universe because he's the child of a Wakandan spy and we wouldn't have those until LATE in T'Chaka's reign in my version.
but here's the problem. no matter what I keep, SOMEbody's going to be hella pissed about what i cut.
Last edited by Redjack; 12-21-2019 at 02:34 PM.
Last edited by Redjack; 12-21-2019 at 05:11 PM.
I'm telling you, your explanations really aren't selling me on why you CANT be able to write the book.
Honestly the book currently doesn't feel like it has any agency or direction. Atleast not where T'Challa is concerned. It's literally blame T'Challa for whatever new Western atrocity Coates is deciding to shackle onto the mythos and then have a supporting cast member save the day. Hardly a strong pov, and definitely breaking the toys, I mean look how much retconning have been done already?
It seems more like the comics side just doesn't care enough to make sure everything is coherent. I mean look at how much more restrictions Coates has on Cap as opposed to T'Challa. If Coates did the same thing to cap as he has done to Cap, he would of been canceled hard.
As for your last point, what your changing honestly is just repurposing the mythos to be more inline with the MCU. Sure people may not like EVERYTHING, but if it gives consistently and keeps the core aspects of T'Challa and Wakanda, i think most people would be okay with it.
Even among us fans here we praise what we like abd criticize what we don't, no bias among criticism, Priest and Hudlin aren't exempt from that. It's the simple fact that for the criticisms they get, the good far outweighs the bad. For Coates the opposite is true. And really the good isn't even his doing. It's the artists and stelfreeze's ideas and aesthetics.
Why?
To me, there was absolutely nothing wrong wit Priest, Hudlin and Liss's respective takes on T'Challa as a character, Wakanda as an important part of the MU tapestry and the BP Mythos as a vibrant intellectual property that grew into a movie that took the world by storm. (No pun intended.)
I for one, understood exactly why both Priest and then Hudlin carried Chris Claremont's introduction of Ororo and T'Challa's meeting as teenagers and then, grow same into a marriage that actually fulfilled Charles Xavier's dream of Mutants and Humans living in peace which one would presume could have led on to incredible stories between the X--franchise, BP Mythos in particular and the MU shared universe in general.
Ororo and T'Challa being married was never a problem.
It was the total lack of imagination on the part of some writers in the past and some in the present, that failed to truly understand the concept of a shared universe let alone respecting the tenets of basic continuity.
Ta Nehisi Coates has carried out a sustained desecration of the BP Mythos for the past three years and is scheduled to continue for the forseeable future but apparently his introduction of Wakandan Rape Camps and a thoroughly milquetoast T'Challa, is more acceptable to some than Ororo and T'Challa being married.
Any future writer commissioned to write the next BP run, would do well to remember that making unnecessary changes to the characters mythos on a whim as opposed to established continuity isn't a good look or one that should be blithely accepted by readers without question or critique.