Originally Posted by
FUBAR007
You're entitled to your opinion. Just as we are to ours.
I disagree. Jean progressing and being happily paired with Scott aren't mutually exclusive things. Psychological development doesn't end with marriage. Quite the opposite.
I often find this kind of argument to be a passive-aggressive way of expressing 1) "Jott fatigue" and 2) a desire to see Jean portrayed as a young, single early-20s woman shopping around and having fun.
I'm increasingly convinced Marvel just needs to let Kelly Thompson or Seanan McGuire do an "Untold Tales of Spider-Man"/"X-Men First Class"-type prequel series set during the early Claremont era when Jean and Scott were on-and-off, and Jean was living in Manhattan with Misty Knight. They can show Jean exploring her sexuality, coming into her own as an adult, and all that stuff. Hell, Claremont himself would probably come back to do it.
Which is a bizarre and baseless reading of their relationship. Jean was almost always in the driver's seat. After her resurrection in 1986, they didn't get back together until she wanted to. They didn't get married until she wanted to--when Scott proposed to her, she rejected him. They finally got engaged when she proposed to him. Even Morrison's stated intent for the cause of their break-up was that Jean had frozen Scott out and "stopped being his wife." Jean is the dominant partner in the relationship.
Honestly, I think all this "Jean-as-appendage" stuff is some kind of meta-meme derived from fandom politics and a mis-remembered caricature of her portrayal in the 90s cartoon. The published canon simply doesn't bear it out.
RE: shipping, your response suggests to me you enjoy Scott and Jean as a storyline--an entertaining vehicle of drama and conflict--moreso than as a relationship you're emotionally invested in and want to see succeed. Which is a valid position; ultimately, it's all a matter of taste. (And, FWIW, that puts you more in sync with Marvel editorial's views than my views are.)
Speaking for myself, I "ship" Scott and Jean because, first, their historical relationship emotionally resonated with me and, second, I viewed it not as a cyclical plot device to generate drama and conflict but as a linear narrative building toward a particular future and the next generation of the mythos. Scott and Jean would eventually succeed Xavier, have children that were truly theirs--no more cross-time and clone hoo-ha, and grow into "elder statesmen" roles mentoring the new X-Men of their kids' generation similar to the JSA/Infinity, Inc. model. Consequently, when Morrison broke them up, I felt cheated. (And that's not even getting into the adultery element.)
Now, the better part of two decades later, I'm much wiser about "illusion of change", the conventions of commercial superhero comics, the sliding timeline shenanigans of quietly de-aging characters every decade or so, and never, ever letting them age or mature past a certain point. It's unlikely in the extreme that I'm ever go to see the kinds of Scott and Jean stories I want so I don't expect it. I don't like it, but I got it. And, I voted with my money a long time ago--I stopped buying the books regularly.
Nevertheless, comments that **** on Jott and its place in the mythos, that diminish it, mock it, misread it, or dismiss it, still really, really rub me wrong. The emotional investment is still there. I suppose it's a credit to Claremont's writing of the couple (and Simonson's, Lobdell's, and Nicieza's)--they made me care. That's where the shipping comes from. I expect the other frequent posters in this thread would tell you something similar.