I agree on Scott. But UO?: I liked Aaron's WATXM run a lot. I got it. I don't like everything he's done since, and I think sociopolitical issues IRL have moved on a lot since to cast a more critical light, and I think Bendis' take on Scott the revolutionary was half-baked at best bc Bendis has always been very, very lazy on long-form characterization and plotting in bigger books. But I do think it made sense for Logan to evolve to trying his best, however imperfectly, to shepherd the kids as an unlikely caretaker - he has always had a fondness for kids, going back to Kitty or Katie Power. And I thought it made sense for him to try and shelter them in a non-militant environment.
That said, I understood and sympathized with Scott's ethos even when I felt Bendis constantly fumbled plot and character beats. I thought Beast was the real ******* of the schism. And I think Marvel was, back then at least, very tone-deaf and afraid of identifying too much with Scott's positions - which had moral ambiguity and at times darkness but were always justifiable. Where we are today, politically, socially and in print, is very different.