Originally Posted by
donpricetag
I agree and disagree. We shouldn't start employing or not purely based on aspects of who they are and I also don't think just because your not "x" that your incapable of telling a story about "x" character. That boils down to how creative a person is and how much work they are willing to put into their craft (ie research, interviews etc).
Selection based on criteria will ultimately result in the same problem of exclusion. Just because someone is "x" doesn't mean they'll excel at telling a story about "x". That's writing ability and imagination. I say this knowing and understanding fully that this way of doing business hasn't worked out for us. However, that's not a societal issue, it's oversight.
The actions of editorial and those that give out the jobs not vetting or looking outside of their circles. Naturally, your peers will most likely share your views and most of the time culture, ethnicity etc. But editorial's job is to find the best fits, not based on personal bias and preference. However, that's rarely ever what happens.
For instance, I'd love to see black writer on the X-Men... I don't want to see a black writer on the X-Men writing a weirdly all black X-Men team... As funny as that could be. I don't like the connotation. Despite how many all white X-Men teams have existed. Let's be honest, X-Men take place in a country that's 75% white. Its not the end of the world. Its just disappointing.
My problem isn't in the amount of black characters, it's the quality, attention and their ultimate fates they're given once they're here.