I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
what happened to Thor's axe? Where is it now? is there a worthiness spell to the axe? Who could he gift it to?
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
Honestly, its crap like this that prevents me from picking up Thor anymore. I come to this thread to hear of stuff. When I hear good reports, I'll start actually reading stuff with Thor in it again.
"Sir, does this mean that Ann Margret's not coming?"
----------------------
"One of the maddening but beautiful things about comics is that you have to give characters a sense of change without changing them so much that they violate the essence of who they are." ~ Ann Nocenti, Chris Claremont's X-Men.
I've made a thread about the finale of Aaron's run if you're interested.
https://community.cbr.com/showthread...29#post4748329
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
We get it. You love Aaron's writing on Thor and he can do no wrong.
But this thread is about appreciating the character of Thor. And many of us don't like how he has been portayed as punching bag chump who can't do crap without that pesky hammer in both the Avengers and his own series.
I think an easy way to look at Thanos stories is that anything written by Jim Starlin, Ron Marz and Keith Giffen is the real Thanos while anything written by other authors should be dismissed as a Thanosi clone.
There's been plenty of things that Aaron has written that I haven't liked, like his Doctor Strange run, for instance.
So saying that people who enjoy his Thor run have a wholly uncritical view of Aaron as a writer is false.
People who love or like Aaron's Thor actually do appreciate the character, including incoming writer Donny Cates.
All I can say is I can't imagine being so fragile that I would ever get upset about a fictional character's feats of strength not being adequate enough. I really can't.
If you're inclined to buy into the reductive thinking that Aaron's run has been about "Jobber Thor," sure.