Nah. Too much hassle and the MCU isn't going to have a married Spider-Man anywhere near it. I could see there being a time when some of the characters from Spider-verse show up in the MCU, but they'll be under different circumstances.
Nah. Too much hassle and the MCU isn't going to have a married Spider-Man anywhere near it. I could see there being a time when some of the characters from Spider-verse show up in the MCU, but they'll be under different circumstances.
Every day is a gift, not a given right.
Doctor Strange: "You are the right person to replace Logan."
X-23: "I know there are people who disapprove... Guys on the Internet mainly."
(All-New Wolverine #4)
Sony have no plans to introduce characters who are not spiderman characters. (No, X-Men, No Hulk, No Iron Man etcs) and its best that way. Spiderman does not need a diluted universe. The less appearances the better.
It is not a cinematic universe as MCU is built.Sounds like a cinematic universe to me.
Transformers, Lion King, Shrek, Fast and Furious, Harry Potter are similar to what sony wants to do. MCU is a collection of a different series in a cinematic universe. It is not the same as spiderman.
is a spiderman game the same as a marvel alliance game?
Sony has no plans because they can't do that even if they wanted to. The rights for those characters belong with Marvel. They only have access to Spider-Man and his world. And to the extent you want the crossover stuff, the live-action MCU movies (which are Sony-Disney co-productions) do that anyway.
ITSV did have plans early on for a Dr. Strange cameo but they veto'd it quickly since they don't have access to that character.
Doctor Strange: "You are the right person to replace Logan."
X-23: "I know there are people who disapprove... Guys on the Internet mainly."
(All-New Wolverine #4)
Sony doesn't need to either. Spider-Man has a wonderful universe. the less diluted the better. it's a blessing Sony does not have the rights to other marvel characters. sony focusing on Spider-Man characters is healthier. Any MCU addition would have ruined this movie.
There is a difference. the difference is as distinct as the Spider-Man movie universe of Sam Raimi and the MCU universe movies of kevin feige.
Last edited by Marvelgirl; 02-01-2019 at 08:46 AM.
I agree that Spider-Man works best as a solo hero with little crossover and spillover to and from other heroes and other characters.
There are some iconic stories and events where Spider-Man goes against people outside his corner. The Juggernaut, Dr. Doom, Firelord. You also have Spider-Man's long status and history as the "fifth beatle" of the Fantastic Four, and Spider-Man still feels like Spider-Man when he crosses over with the FF than he does with other characters. Like Iron Man basically makes him "robin".
In the old days it was generally understood by editors and writers that the Shared Universe was mostly a gentleman's agreement. Team-ups and crossovers (in fact the first one was invented in the '80s, Secret Wars) did not spill over into the regular continuity like they do in marvel since the 2000s where Civil War basically became this story that infected every Marvel title.
Crossovers and team-ups are largely to the benefit of characters, like Iron Man, who don't have a supporting cast and rogues gallery to spin many solo content around.
Doctor Strange: "You are the right person to replace Logan."
X-23: "I know there are people who disapprove... Guys on the Internet mainly."
(All-New Wolverine #4)
It's different from both. But it has more in common with Raimi's movies than Avengers.
In The Avengers all the heroes team up to defeat the bad guy. In this one, Miles Morales gets rid of all the Spiders and then takes out the bad guy all by himself. It is essentially the story of Miles Morales whereas the first Avengers and Infinity War were ensemble movies (Age of Ultron was more Tony Stark and the Avengers are all invited).
Avengers literally ends with a shot of Thanos smiling to the audience...Into the Spider-Verse ends with what its own script described as the "most expensive dumb joke in film history" with no real teases for villains and ideas in the future. I mean yeah its franchisable but in the same way everyone looked at Black Panther and said they want a Dora Milaje movie.
As Patrick Willems said on twitter after ITSV, It's great to see a real Spider-Man movie after seeing MCU's billionaire's intern cosplaying as Spider-Man. HE was being overly snarky and mocking but it's basically apt.
And you know MCU Peter is basically Whiteboy Miles.
The difference lies within worldbuilding and perspective. A shared universe follows multiple perspective. For example, the first cinematic universe, the Universal Monsters, followed the perspectives of the titular monsters, but followed the same line of worldbuilding and themes of horror.
Maybe?
Yeah?
Can't say I agree with that.
No, aside from Ned as Ganke (and maybe the school), MCU Peter is basically Ultimate Peter with a few unique bits.
Like how were getting a Spider-Gwen spinoff in the future?
Doctor Strange: "You are the right person to replace Logan."
X-23: "I know there are people who disapprove... Guys on the Internet mainly."
(All-New Wolverine #4)
No,they look similar just because Miles Morales is black Peter Parker in comic.