Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 106 to 116 of 116
  1. #106
    Philosopher King RockyBanks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Mississippi, USA
    Posts
    715

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kees_L View Post
    Bullshit. That's like saying that before chainsaws nobody ever chopped down a tree or that without KFC chickens wouldn't have ever been considered food.

    Comics or entertainment or leisure material can and always have been making itself available to people. Plus people can enthuse themselves even regardless of geeks or internet or DVRs and regardless of whatever "social detriments".

    Adolescent stereotype notions like geek/jock/dweeb/nerd are just highschool lingo from back in the 1970 or 1980s, which large entertainment companies have been buying into for the sake of making themselves money.

    Whereas as you say "the traditional geek" would exist way broader and more initially than merely comics or television considerably (Wikipedia):


    It's one thing to try and classify everything in the big bad world into tropes and stereotypes (like geek/nerd etcetera) when you'd be a little kid, but beyond that there's just gonna fit a whole lot more into it, making it not useful to be regarding things in such narrow terms, for anyone, whatever their social detriments.
    Consumer tech in the 21st century has made it easier than ever for the average individual to delve into the deep, dark corners of their hobby or fandom. Every episode of your favorite TV series, the latest breaking news about your obscure hobby, and discussion forums about your every interest are at your fingertips 24/7. Pop culture is leading the way in the decentralization of our social consciousness, as individuals drift away from a homogenous "mainstream" and toward 1000 different specialized echo chambers. Even something as basic as your primary news source is often tailored to your specific political beliefs. (See: FOX News vs MSNBC, Drudge Report vs Huffington Post, etc.)

    Delving so deep into any particular interest took far more effort 40 years ago, so "geekdom" was a much smaller crowd made up of individuals with a particular drive and focus.

    My perception--take it with a grain of salt--is that individuals increasingly see the seeds of geekdom within themselves.

  2. #107
    MXAAGVNIEETRO IS RIGHT MyriVerse's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4,117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kees_L View Post
    Adolescent stereotype notions like geek/jock/dweeb/nerd are just highschool lingo from back in the 1970 or 1980s, which large entertainment companies have been buying into for the sake of making themselves money.
    The concepts go back a lot further than that (to at least the wartime years). While they are predominately adolescent things, they is a tendency for them to be carried over to lesser degrees into adulthood.
    f/k/a The Black Guardian
    COEXIST | NOEXIST
    ShadowcatMagikДаякѕтая Sto☈mDustMercury MonetRachelSage
    MagnetoNightcrawlerColossusRockslideBeastXavier

  3. #108
    Incredible Member Kees_L's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RockyBanks View Post
    My perception--take it with a grain of salt--is that individuals increasingly see the seeds of geekdom within themselves.
    Personally I'll prefer to regard *enthusiasm* as just that, more rather than shallow simplification as what any tropes or stereotypification would constitute to.

    Quote Originally Posted by MyriVerse View Post
    The concepts go back a lot further than that (to at least the wartime years). While they are predominately adolescent things, they is a tendency for them to be carried over to lesser degrees into adulthood.
    As amounting to but shallow and by definition but negative presumptuousness they'll be concepts, but even as a kid I've only been taught or prone to not believe in or go by it, at all.

    Every person may like or enjoy such things as leisure or sports or entertainment, every and any person, without neededly fitting anything as dumb and phoney as whatever marketing typification. As persons or personalities and their preferences would go, they won't be as superficial as constructed consumer labelments, by definition.
    SLINT / Mike Mignola / Walt Whitman / Arthur Lourié / Dr. Pepper

  4. #109
    older Mormel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,050

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kees_L View Post
    Every person may like or enjoy such things as leisure or sports or entertainment, every and any person, without neededly fitting anything as dumb and phoney as whatever marketing typification. As persons or personalities and their preferences would go, they won't be as superficial as constructed consumer labelments, by definition.
    Thing is, it's not just marketing.
    When I was in secondary school (middelbare), the kids that ended up at the 'unpopular table' during the lunch breaks [including me] and were considered the geeky kids, didn't choose that label. We were sort of the spit-outs of our respective classes. The rejects, the unwanted. All for very different reasons; we just sort of coagulated into a 'geek group' in part because our interests matched or overlapped, and in part because we shared a feeling of being the rejected kids, the weirdos. It was a label I ended up embracing and owning.
    Take my dreams, childish and weak at the seams
    Please don't analyze, please just be there for me

  5. #110
    Incredible Member Kees_L's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mormel View Post
    Thing is, it's not just marketing.
    When I was in secondary school (middelbare), the kids that ended up at the 'unpopular table' during the lunch breaks [including me] and were considered the geeky kids, didn't choose that label. We were sort of the spit-outs of our respective classes. The rejects, the unwanted. All for very different reasons; we just sort of coagulated into a 'geek group' in part because our interests matched or overlapped, and in part because we shared a feeling of being the rejected kids, the weirdos. It was a label I ended up embracing and owning.
    Oh sure thing Morm, I will believe that or anybody their personal or sincerest outlooks or experiences. I will believe them and respect them and not mean to take anything away from them.

    But I will NOT base any belief of my own on such things as stereotypes and tropes as any leading thing. Stereotypes or tropes are by their own definition not meant to be taken for granted or prove leading as otherwise they wouldn't be called stereotypes but just real things instead.

    When kids pick on one another or any singling out amid large groups for anyone happens without reason or rhyme to it, it just follows from uneasyness or stress due to groups proving hard to be in under certain circumstances as being to arise.

    I don't believe in detriments bearing strict correlation towards such stuff as *reading* or *enthusiasm*, as any stuff could and would be to vary for people. The varying is what art appreciation or reading or creativity would be evolving around as much as any personalities could and would be making persons be to differ.

    A geek or nerd isn't by any means a different species from whatever other people. Neither would any trope or stereotype be fact or it wouldn't be a trope to begin with.

    I believe that only persons - all or any persons could decide or find out how they'd be liking anything or not, as by actually experiencing it. Not by marketing strategies or those summized product descriptions like on the back of a book. Those things are not meant to be taken as law, I'd believe.

    That's how I find notions as geek- or nerd- bullshit myself.
    Last edited by Kees_L; 08-07-2014 at 02:09 PM.
    SLINT / Mike Mignola / Walt Whitman / Arthur Lourié / Dr. Pepper

  6. #111
    Fantastic Member Charles RB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    350

    Default

    Do you miss the days when nerds were outcasts?
    I miss that as much as much as I miss the days before vaccines. Being an outcast because of the fictional media you like is balls, it's miles better to not have that. I don't know why there are nerds who hate that (but it makes more sense than hearing the odd person moaning London Pride - or whatever city's gay-rights march - is "too mainstream", like you miss the days when your sexuality was seen as a disgusting abomination by mainstream society. Nobody ever passed a law banning the "promotion" of comics)

  7. #112
    BANNED Mikekerr3's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    3,296

    Default

    I am nostagic for my teems when a geek was a side-show act at disreputable carnivals, and erd was not a word.
    Hell I am even nostalgic for th days when nerd meant a very smart and social awkward person., not a fanatical hobbiest

  8. #113
    It's been fun. Toodles. Paradox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Millennium City MI/Kalamazoo MI
    Posts
    4,276

    Default

    Nerd goes back much farther than your teens, Mike.

    http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=nerd
    'Dox out.

    "It’s cold and it’s mean-spirited and I don’t like it here anymore." - Alan Moore

    "Can it, you nit!" - Violet Beauregard

    "And Paradox is never correct. About anything."- Kid Omega


    The Conclave group page on Primus (a work in progress)
    Champions: The Conclave (an updating Facebook Gallery)
    Decorum & Friends (A City of Heroes archive)

  9. #114
    Fantastic Member tombo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    442

    Default

    I've thought about this a lot, and I do think that the sci fi fandom world has "opened up" to more "regular folk" in the past 15 years, in my world anyway. You look at the shows that were big before, like Star Trek DS9 and TNG, they all had quite stiff, wooden (or strange and over-acting) characters. All unusual characters with an "asperger" appeal, wheras folk with regular social skills were enjoying the banter on shows like "Friends", with not much in sci-fi to offer them. Now look at what we have had since, Buffy, the Raimi Spider-man films, Doctor Who, the rise of anime over here. When I was a kid in the early 90s, the most popular anime and comics here were only violent action stuff, like Dredd and Akira. My comic book store was full of "erotic" and 60s nostalgia merch about Betty Page, Russ Meyer films, the Steed and Peel Avengers, etc. I was the only non middle aged man in there, apart from the owner's wife. Now you see such a wider appeal across gender, personality type, age. The same store is so much more social, lively and young. I think Buffy definitely opened the floodgates among people I knew for "comic-book-ish storylines that appealed to regular teenagers and normal-social-skills people". I say this, because I myself am a diagnosed autistic and I've always found the banter in things like Whedon's shows much more "non-autistic" than say, DS9 which feels to me like it was made for folk like me. Just a personal feeling.

    I mean, the other day I saw a girl of about 15 in town reading a Batman comic, and it made me think how much things changed. When I was 15, if I had seen a girl my age reading a Batman comic..or anyone reading a Batman comic, my eyes would have popped out of my head. I only knew one other Bat-fan in my city then.

    As for do I miss it, no. I've really enjoyed the past 15 years of having female friends, friends my own age, getting me into comedy anime, Harry Potter, etc, instead of just being resigned to knowing that most friends will not know my interests and the only people I had to chat about them being a bunch of old men in the comic shop. I did sometimes feel more "in my comfort zone" then though, in terms of sci-fi/comics being a "world to hide away in". (ie, being more obscure and hidden from society).
    Last edited by tombo; 08-08-2014 at 09:39 AM.

  10. #115
    Fantastic Member tombo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    442

    Default

    I am bumping because I feel like introvert and want attention, I apoligise for the rudeness.

  11. #116
    Super Moderator Stony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,891

    Default

    No, because I enjoy talking about things I like with people, and the more people that like the things I do, the more good chat there is.

    Having said that, I was surprised at my own reaction to something I saw the other week.

    I was on Facebook and a friend liked the status of another friend, a guy both my friend and I had gone to high school with
    Back in high school this guy was... not a jock, we don't really have those down here, but a pretty popular, rugby-playing guy... though not an *******, from what I recall
    Anyway, this guy linked to something that happened at Comic-Con and wrote "Nerds rock!!"

    I looked at this and thought "Mate, you were the furthest thing from a nerd in high school!!"

    So, it's nice that they're coming around... but I guess we all have to make adjustments

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •