Ya, Marvel has made it well known the characters on the promotional material is what they are pushing post SW. Its the most likely scenario, but you never know if it just means headlining a group book.
I dislike Legacy names because of the dishonesty with it. It wants to push something new, but borrows from wider known properties to get eyes on it. Laura is never going to be "the" Wolverine. It will always be "the other wolverine" "fem wolverine" "x-23" or "Laura". I prefer when characters are focused on themselves, and not spring-boarding off of something else. Now of course money talks, and it can be effective for pushing something forward (albeit potentially trapping them at the same time), so disapproval means very little.
To be fair, the audience isn't using it in a discriminatory fashion, or trying to directly offend a comic character with it. They just latch on to the most identifiable, widely accepted, or recognizable name to call something. Considering the generic of "Laura" (not to mention rarely if ever referred to with a last name), the options are pretty limited. Sadly its not going to get much better. She may be referred to as Wolverine in universe, but in a wider discussion there will always need to be an attached term to differentiate herself from Logan.Anything that gets her away from being identified by the codename X-23 has a chance to be good. In story it was meant to dehumanize, but the fans seem unable to accept anything else.
Storm actually looks pretty good. Laura ain't bad. The rest are too busy as you say.Way too busy and cartoony.