Was anybody else dissapointed that he just yelled a little at Fury and then sort of forgot to ask about the dead blue giant alien?
Was anybody else dissapointed that he just yelled a little at Fury and then sort of forgot to ask about the dead blue giant alien?
The most likely use of Ward is going to be a "Blacklist/Silence of the Lambs/Escape from New York" kind of a deal - they'll use a device like they did with Skye when they considered her a traitor except maybe in a more lethal fashion..
Well, let's be fair, there's not exact moral equivalence here, either of ends or means. Fury and Coulson and the loyal members of Coulson's team certainly believe, down to the bone, that their ends are righteous ones of protection. And while it's certainly fair to point out that they are willing to employ pretty shady techniques in pursuit of those goals, so that to a certain extent they're espousing a utilitarian 'ends justify the means' philosophy, even in the means they're willing to go to, SHIELD under Fury and the loyalist SHIELD agents (as opposed to HYDRA now) are not nearly as extreme. Will they use lethal force under some circumstances, such as open combat or commando missions? Sure, nature of the job, but they're certainly not as prone to extrajudicial execution/assassination or just plain cold blooded murder as HYDRA appears to be. Part of why Romanov switched to working for SHIELD was because she wouldn't be employed, at least primarily, as an assassin, since she wanted to balance the red in her ledger, not add to it. Another case in point, the Bonnie and Clyde couple that made the Chitauri weapon work and went on a bank robbing spree - they expected to be killed or at least disappeared, and instead they got low-level SHIELD jobs. Wonder what happened to them in the recent events, too. Anyway, this is an arena in which the specific actors really are important to the moral equations, unless you want to make the case that undercover investigations are never, ever justified for any reason whatsoever.
Now, with Ward, do his skill set and specific connections suggest he might be useful to the team/SHIELD again on some basis? Absolutely, and there's a lot of drama there, but for the team to never trust or let their eyes off him after these events doesn't make them babies with wee tender feelings, it just makes them properly wary of a trained dog that's already bit them once. Should they perhaps have been wary to begin with? Sure, but with the possible exceptions of Coulson and May (who long since drank the Fury Kool-Aid about SHIELD's noble purpose), that was never really their skill set, neither the techies nor anti-establishment recruit Skye. If there's to be a redemption arc, it'll have to be a long and winding one.
This is a comic universe. In the comics , bad guys switch sides all the time. Magneto , so much damage and threaten the homo sapiens all the time , oh he's good now ? Okay.
There are lots of different types of spy stories, though, and to the extent that one set in a superhero universe is ever purely a spy show, it's always going to have more in common with James Bond or Mission Impossible or Man from UNCLE than with grittier spy dramas like le Carre's Smiley novels. So, you can't really conclude that absolute grey lack of moral absolutes or differences seen in such stories (and not entirely there, really, given that Smiley is actually extremely loyal and patriotic and as moral as the job ever allows for, and able to inculcate similar attitudes in others) is ever going to be the protagonistic viewpoint in AoS, although I suppose an antagonist might argue for it.
TL;DR; even in a spy show, there can still be good guys you're meant to root for vs. bad guys you're meant to hiss at, even though it can be argued that spying is to a certain extent an inherently bad thing. But then, the same thing can be said of physical violence in any action genre, including superheroes.
Since Skye already demonstrated she couldn't let another bad guy kill the guy rather than reveal critical intel, I seriously doubt that any of them will react in exactly that manner. Shoot, even May didn't kill him when he was down and helpless, although she'd probably be perfectly happy to give him a few more beat downs (and said as much).
Or, since the rebuilding SHIELD is probably not big enough to have its own prison facilities, and it's going to be difficult to document many of his transgressions to the satisfaction of the regular authorities, there's an opening for some rival intelligence/security operation to pick him up as an asset. Think Section One, not the actual organization from La Femme Nikita of course, but some group that operates in that manner.
Strictly speaking, the only reason they escaped was because Nick Fury was paying attention. They'd both have drowned otherwise.
Also, it's not as if Ward had the option of just shooting them in the face, or the time and resources to patiently burn through the door after that EMP that put Garrett at death's door.
well at least one of the lab rats is gone and Wards still a bad guy so im Ok with how the season ended