Originally Posted by
Korath
But all of this rest on Johns failure to realize that the strength of Watchmen is a very simple plot ("Someone is killing former vigilantes and must be found"), juxtaposed with a complex setting ("a world very much like our own, on the verge of nuclear annihilation because of the existence of a lone all-powerful individual") allowed the exploration of a small set of characters, which had space to be flesh out and play out with each other, allowing for the deepness of the story. Dr. Manhattan, Rorschach, Nite Owl, Silk Spectre, Ozymandias, and to a lesser extent the Comedian are the sole true characters of the story.
Meanwhile, in Doomsday Clock, we had, from the beginning Ozymandias, Rorschach II, Mime, Marionette, Saturn Girl, Johnny Thunder, Superman, Batman, Lew, The Comedian, Doctor Manhattan (perhaps others I'm forgetting) which were positioned as important (or at least looked like they would be important). And that's without counting the subplots of the Supermen Theory, Khandaq, the Villains in Gotham (or was it Metropolis?) and perhaps other which have also slipped off my mind.
Doomsday Clock was always far too crowded, far too unsure of what it wanted to be, what story it wanted to tell, to have more than one and a half important character : Ozymandias and Jon. And that's it. And that's why we are where we are today. Not because of editorial interference betraying a perfect evergreen story. But an over-ambitious writer who found himself stuck for too long, unable to move and leaving us with a convoluted story which seems to go nowhere, because we don't understand what's at stake inside the story.
I'm not saying that Doomsday Clock was ever bad. But it was always empty. Sure, it gave more of that pure sugary Nostalgia to the fans who so clearly relished it with the Rebirth Special and initiative, which allowed DC and themselves to slash and burn everything done during the New 52, as if nothing even average had been done there, often in the most petty of manners (with Greg Rucka and Dan Jurgens taking the spotlight for most blatant and arrogant shots at what came before). But Doomsday Clock was full of problems from the star, which would have always precluded it from being that great game-changer in the DC Universe so many clearly craved.
Because, unlike Metal which -while clearly not as well crafted as Doomsday Clock told a far better story, adding things up to the DCU instead of erasing more to bring back some selective pieces of its past- Doomsday Clock was too hang-up with being the "new Watchmen" but in the DCU, with aberrant choices (such as setting the story one or some years in the future is almost always a receipt for disaster, especially in a universe like comics, with dozens of creators working separately from each other) to truly create more, to be, for a lack of better term, generous. Snyder can sometimes be too much, creating too much new things, so being generous isn't in itself a quality, but by trying to be a worthy Watchmen successor, Doomsday Clock could never marry the nihilistic tone of its precursor with an expansion of the DCU.
Johns did try to add things up (the Supermen Theory, the Khandaq as a refuge for metahumans), but, let's be honest. Did anyone ever believed that such monumental elements could be truly treated in a satisfying way in a 12 issues series ? So far, those elements were mostly used so that Black Adam would punch Superman into Dr. Manhattan. Literally. By trying to tell an incredibly momentous story, Geoff Jonhs kind of shot himself in the foot, and we are left with what we have today, and I think that editorial intervention has very little to do with it.
At least, that's how I feel about the whole project.