How do you rate Chip Zdarksky's Peter Parker: The Spectacular Spider-Man run?

[Batman Begins 2005]

I jumped on with Peter Parker: The Spectacular Spider-Man #6 and went through till the end with #310. I'd go great, more so for My Dinner With Jonah and Finale. This was my first time creating a poll here so nice to see it worked out. Hope the options cater to tastes.

[oldschool]

Between good and great for me, so ....... very good if that was an option? Ultimately, I voted "good" simply because I thought his first 3-4 issues were poor, then quickly became great through the Jonah issue and a bit beyond. But then the time travel arc went on waaayyyy too long and simply wasn't good enough to take up nearly a year of the title's run. Moreover, issue #300 should have been special and instead it was just another chapter (or two) of that long drawn-out story (though that is probably more on editorial than Chip).

I think his run ended very strongly, thought; the Sandman 2-parter was really good and his swan song issue was great.

[Batman Begins 2005]

Between good and great for me, so ....... very good if that was an option? Ultimately, I voted "good" simply because I thought his first 3-4 issues were poor, then quickly became great through the Jonah issue and a bit beyond. But then the time travel arc went on waaayyyy too long and simply wasn't good enough to take up nearly a year of the title's run. Moreover, issue #300 should have been special and instead it was just another chapter (or two) of that long drawn-out story (though that is probably more on editorial than Chip).

I think his run ended very strongly, thought; the Sandman 2-parter was really good and his swan song issue was great.

I can agree with most of this. The Tinkerer storyline dragged and #300 really sucked as an anniversary issue. I heard the issues before #6 were weak. I don't know if I'll visit them for completions sake or not.

[Miles To Go]

Good.

Zdarksy proved he could be an exceptional Spider-Man writer with the Jameson conversation, development of Teresa Parker, the Sandman issues, and finale. His anniversary time-travel story however went on too long and didn't feel all that inspired near the end, also did not take to another generic "Gwen is a hardass" character depiction in the altered timeline. To me, it just reinforced how bland the character is outside of the Spider-Gwen interpretation.

[Prof. Warren]

It was a good run with some really great moments.

[Scott Taylor]

Excellent. Everything I would have wanted and more. The only way it could have been better is if it did me laundry and made lasagna for me.

[Celgress]

A mixed bag in all honesty. The run started off weak, became very strong, then fizzled out towards its end.

[Mister Mets]

I'd say it's good. It's a mixed bag, with a weak start, but some really great stuff, especially the last issue, and the Jonah conversation.

A drawback is that some of the great material is part of a much larger tale that has some weaker chapters, so it can't be completely removed from it.

He was able to work with great artists, with Kubert, Quinones and himself.

[DrewHLMW]

Issue #6 and #310 are brilliant but the rest was pretty average for me.

[Jekyll]

Between average and poor for me. There were several issues that I couldn’t even finish and I eventually dropped the book. It just wasn’t for me.