Page 414 of 434 FirstFirst ... 314364404410411412413414415416417418424 ... LastLast
Results 6,196 to 6,210 of 6499
  1. #6196
    BANNED Killerbee911's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Domino_Dare-Doll View Post
    No it doesn't; Moira herself says so during one of Senator Kelly's speech, during his election campaign. To quote: "Mutants are human ye daft git."

    If, as Hickman says, every X-men story matters, including this one, then is this now considered to be a retcon rather than re-contextualisation? Especially if this occurred within life 10 and even after Moira had committed herself to this path?
    No Marvel and writers go back forth between ideas like I said they don't seem to know what mutants are suppose to be sometimes.

  2. #6197
    Ultimate Member Wiccan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    12,926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Devaishwarya View Post
    The same way two humans would have a mutant child...like Kate e.g. it's quite random.
    I don't think it's the same. Of course mutants can just be born from random parents, but when it comes to mutants having children, the usual is for them to inherit at least one of their parents' powers(like how all the Grey-Summers kids have TP/TK like Jean), which can only be explained by them getting the X-Gene from their parents' DNA rather than by chance like mutants born out of humans.
    Last edited by Wiccan; 10-14-2019 at 05:06 AM.

  3. #6198
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    1,727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Killerbee911 View Post
    No Marvel and writers go back forth between ideas like I said they don't seem to know what mutants are suppose to be sometimes.
    Well I don't agree on that; maybe in a meta-sense Marvel has tried to flip flop, but it doesn't change their core origin. Mutants were created as an off-shoot of humanity, not a separate or alien species. If they can be born from humans and give birth to humans, then they are human.

  4. #6199
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    1,727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiccan View Post
    I don't think it's the same. Of course mutants can just be born from random parents, but when it comes to mutants having children, the usual is for them to inherit at least one of their parents' powers(like how all the Grey-Summers kids have TP/TK like Jean), which can only be explained by them getting the X-Gene from their parents' DNA rather than by chance like mutants born out of humans.
    True, but you do also get the Graydon Creed's of the world; powerless despite having two fairly powerful parents themselves.

  5. #6200
    Sarveśām Svastir Bhavatu Devaishwarya's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    14,049

    Default

    I know the classification and theory is all over the place but for simplicity... I'm sticking with the Mutants are humans with an extra special x-gene.
    Like: a man with extra toes and fingers, or having red hair, heterochromia or a genius brain.
    Their baseline genetic make-up is human...but with a genetic "anomaly".
    Lord Ewing *Praise His name! Uplift Him in song!* Your divine works will be remembered and glorified in worship for all eternity. Amen!

  6. #6201
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    1,727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Devaishwarya View Post
    I know the classification and theory is all over the place but for simplicity... I'm sticking with the Mutants are humans with an extra special x-gene.
    Like: a man with extra toes and fingers, or having red hair, heterochromia or a genius brain.
    Their baseline genetic make-up is human...but with a genetic "anomaly".
    Ditto! Couldn't agree more, in fact!

  7. #6202
    Incredible Member FIGHT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    743

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Domino_Dare-Doll View Post
    Well I don't agree on that; maybe in a meta-sense Marvel has tried to flip flop, but it doesn't change their core origin. Mutants were created as an off-shoot of humanity, not a separate or alien species. If they can be born from humans and give birth to humans, then they are human.
    Dogs and Wolves. 2 different things. 1 is an off-shoot species, yet they can still have kids. Their situation is not unique. Look up Coydog.
    I only continue to read X-books because I don't spend any money on it.

  8. #6203
    Ultimate Member JKtheMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bedford UK
    Posts
    10,323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omega Alpha View Post
    Namor certainly seemed to think so.
    That is based upon Charles’ current mindset not a canon thing.
    “And I urge you to please notice when you are happy, and exclaim or murmur or think at some point, 'If this isn't nice, I don't know what is.” ― Kurt Vonnegut Jr.

  9. #6204
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    1,727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FIGHT View Post
    Dogs and Wolves. 2 different things. 1 is an off-shoot species, yet they can still have kids. Their situation is not unique. Look up Coydog.
    Yes, I agree. They are different and unique, but not completely disconnected. Much of a wolf's instincts are what even lead to the dogs we know today's behaviour patterns and emotional evolutions. Different in some ways, similar in others; especially on base-genetics.

  10. #6205
    Ultimate Member JKtheMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bedford UK
    Posts
    10,323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spirit2011 View Post
    He never believed on his dream after meeting Moira
    That’s your interpretation and it contradicts the book so not many will share it. Hickman is clearly indicating this isn’t the case and that Moira spent a long while trying to convince him to change his dream. I mean did you just not read the text pages?

    Quote Originally Posted by H-E-D View Post
    To me, Xavier's speech in House of X #6 read to me that it took until the modern era for Xavier to finally come around to Moira's point of view, even knowing what he knew.
    Absolutely.
    “And I urge you to please notice when you are happy, and exclaim or murmur or think at some point, 'If this isn't nice, I don't know what is.” ― Kurt Vonnegut Jr.

  11. #6206
    Ultimate Member Fokken's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    11,430

    Default

    The division among X-fans resulting from HoX/PoX is FASCINATING.

    Some believe the Krakoan nation forfeits the X-Men from being "good guys".
    Some believe the Krakoan nation is revolutionary.
    Some believe this is too drastic a departure from "The Dream".
    Some argue the dream died long ago and this is a pragmatic approach.
    Some believe its high time they stopped taking it on the chin.
    Some believe losing the underdog status lessens their appeal.
    And so on and so on.

    I wonder: With Hox/Pox being the phenomenon that it is -- bringing new readers & bringing BACK readers long lost -- how many of these beliefs/opinions on either side feel more drastic by the LACK of back-issue-content?
    How many of the opinions arguing against Krakoa are folks who stopped reading long ago, and therefore lack additional context to potentially inform/guide/shape this shift? And vice versa.

    Krakoa's evolution will be very intriguing to watch unfold, as will the readership's evolving acceptance/rejection and all that's in between. Feels like the Utopia days, which I absolutely loved.
    Scott banded together with known "villains" to form a sovereign nation, offering their services TO humanity while embracing a zero tolerance policy OF humanity.
    And now we have Krakoa.
    Krakoa is populated by mutants who fought FOR humanity and by mutants who fought AGAINST humanity.
    Heroes and villains, if we're to use very black and white terms. Then again INTENT/MOTIVATION for being radicalized is, in my humble opinion, essential in determining and understanding "villainy".


    The division among X-fans mirrors that of Krakoa's populace. haha.

  12. #6207
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    1,727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fokken View Post
    I wonder: With Hox/Pox being the phenomenon that it is -- bringing new readers & bringing BACK readers long lost -- how many of these beliefs/opinions on either side feel more drastic by the LACK of back-issue-content?
    I can only speak for myself here, but having gone in with the back-issue content, I'm convinced more than ever of skipping the main-line book. This feels like an epic retcon, not a re-contextualisation.

  13. #6208
    Ultimate Member JKtheMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bedford UK
    Posts
    10,323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woozie View Post
    Odd, cause I fully think Hickman's X-work is easily his worst Marvel outting, by a substantial degree. Nothing in this comes close to Time Runs Out or the Council of Reeds in terms of tension and climax.
    Those are endings. This is a beginning, they don’t compare.
    “And I urge you to please notice when you are happy, and exclaim or murmur or think at some point, 'If this isn't nice, I don't know what is.” ― Kurt Vonnegut Jr.

  14. #6209
    BANNED Killerbee911's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Domino_Dare-Doll View Post
    Well I don't agree on that; maybe in a meta-sense Marvel has tried to flip flop, but it doesn't change their core origin. Mutants were created as an off-shoot of humanity, not a separate or alien species. If they can be born from humans and give birth to humans, then they are human.
    This is not hill I care to fight on other than to point out which presentation they are on at the time. Right now it looks like the species push under Hickman. Once again Mutants stuff is wonky, The fiction should be more clear but the longer Hickman is on the book the more likely that will happen. Humans with a different genes not even that holds up completely because you can "cure" a mutant which suggests that mutants are viral based if you think about it.

  15. #6210
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    1,727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Killerbee911 View Post
    This is not hill I care to fight on other than to point out which presentation they are on at the time. Right now it looks like the species push under Hickman. Once again Mutants stuff is wonky, The fiction should be more clear but the longer Hickman is on the book the more likely that will happen. Humans with a different genes not even that holds up completely because you can "cure" a mutant which suggests that mutants are viral based if you think about it.
    I still don't agree with it, therefore I don't agree with Hickman's interpretation and, therefore, don't agree with the reasoning. As for the 'genetic cure', I don't see that as much different than how some scientists talk of 'curing' a genetic disability in an unborn fetus--Downs Syndrome for example, or even most strains of muscular dystrophy definitely not viral and a whole separate discussion on its own.

    Let's just agree to disagree and leave it there; we won't get any further on this subject.
    Last edited by Domino_Dare-Doll; 10-14-2019 at 05:44 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •