X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
A lot of the articles I see about that are not even mentioning his party affiliation, like here:
He is, of course, a family values Republican who taught Sunday school.
However, every single story about scummy Ed Buck finally getting arrested leads with him being a "Democratic Donor." He never even ran for any office.
Trump, Carson reject California's request for federal help on homelessness
At the same time that President Donald Trump and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson are promising federal action to intervene in homelessness in California, they're rejecting requests from local officials for help and escalating the blame game between the federal government and the state.California Gov. Newsom and local leaders. including mayors of the state's 13 largest cities. wrote to Trump this week to ask for more federal funds to expand programs like housing vouchers that help people get off the street into stable living situations.
“We can all agree that homelessness is a national crisis decades in the making that demands action at every level of government – local, state, and federal. In California, state and local governments have ramped up action to lift families out of poverty by investing in behavioral health, affordable housing, and other homeless programs,” they wrote. “In contrast, your Administration has proposed significant cuts to public housing and programs like the Community Development Block Grant.”
The Trump administration has rejected that request.
Original join date: 11/23/2004
Eclectic Connoisseur of all things written, drawn, or imaginatively created.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
Also, Trump has returned to trying to get Rep. Ilhan Omar assassinated by an Islamophobe, he just retweeted someone claiming that she "partied" on 9/11.
X-Books Forum Mutant Tracker/FAQ- Updated every Tuesday.
Why doesn't Twitter just take his account away?
"Always listen to the crazy scientist with a weird van or armful of blueprints and diagrams." -- Vibranium
When it comes to this subject and affiliation...
The only reason we even know about the images on Folmer's phone or Buck is because they slipped up.
While I don't disagree about that there's a slant, I'd imagine that a magic spell where we could see a skull and crossbones on the shirt of every person that has the sort of thing Folmer had on his phone might net quite a few folks from every corner of political affiliation.
Probably be enough to make you just want to walk out into traffic.
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
But what alternative are you suggesting?
Should undocumented families get citizenship? Should they be allowed to stay in some sort of second-class status? Should parents and kids be deported together?
Some policies have bad consequences but remain the least bad option. So we do need a sense of the alternatives in order to determine whether an existing policy could be replaced without getting something worse.
This is a failing on both sides. Democrats decry Republican immigration policy without being clear about their own plans (IE- What does comprehensive reform mean? What limits should there be on legal immigration?) Republicans kept complaining about Obamacare, but didn't have an alternative they could all support.
The chain of posts was about other people's views and how they might interpret numbers. With those numbers, the tradeoff in a reduction in abortions makes up for an increase in deaths, although the latter number is probably exaggerated.
We probably greatly exaggerate the healthcare services provided by Planned Parenthood, as well as the effects of government funding on the organization. Fundraising has been brisk since Trump's election, and their biggest problems seem to be own-goals, like the firing of their president Leana Wen, and the ensuing legal fight.
I was asking what policy you would explicitly advocate for.
The increase in abortion rates is in comparison to the levels of abortion that conservative Republicans want (which varies from none at all to special exceptions like rape, incest and an elected official's pregnant mistress.)
The phrasing in the original post which got you to ask me to explain my understanding was "It seems odd to suggest that Republicans want more black and brown babies as part of a racist strategy" so that's the context of our discussion.
With less abortions, there would be more black babies. Reducing access to abortion does ultimately reduce abortion rates, even if there are all sorts of other consequences. However, the number of prevented abortions is almost going to be more than 700 an year (this assumes that every pregnancy/ childbirth related death is avoidable with Democrats in total control of government which is probably not the case) so it will still result in more black lives.
Most media sources link the pervert's party, including the first article posted in this thread.
They don't want the fight about Silicon Valley censoring a Republican President.
There would also be a lot of ensuing arguments of whataboutism. I'd also imagine that a few partisan liberals at twitter would prefer the President be less disciplined in his communication as that increases the chances of Democrats winning the next election.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets