Results 1 to 15 of 9947

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tendrin View Post
    I didn't say that, of course, and it wasn't my point. She had an extremely progressive policy platform which, if policies mattered like people want to say they did, her actually very detailed policies should have mattered more but instead even now we have people talking caricature and character over policy because 'prison industrial complex!'.

    Policy is nice. Having a plan is nice for those of us who give a crap about it but most people pretty obviously don't.
    But if the policy is not the focus, then what is? If policy does not matter, why not nominate Brad Pitt to take on Trump?


    Some fluff piece in the Boston Globe said she had the most ''progress policy platform ever'', why should people assume that was anything but a bunch of empty promises based on her record? Was she a progressive when she decided to support the invasion of Iraq?
    Last edited by The Overlord; 06-29-2019 at 06:15 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •