A question about a weekly series

[babyblob]

I know that Dc did 52 and I enjoyed it. Didnt they do another weekly series? If they did what was the name of it? Thanks for the help.

[MajorHoy]

I know that Dc did 52 and I enjoyed it. Didnt they do another weekly series? If they did what was the name of it? Thanks for the help.

Well, there was Countdown/Countdown to Final Crisis, but I think a majority of people felt that was "52 done wrong".

There have also been some Batman weekly series: Batman Eternal and Batman and Robin Eternal.

[bob.schoonover]

*Trinity (Kurt Busiek and Mark Bagley) was a weekly series done after 52. Basically followed Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman (hence the name). I enjoyed it, and it was interesting, structurally, because (approximately) each issue was 10 pages of Bagley art and 10 pages of another artist.

*Future's End, which, I did not read, happened during the New 52 and had an intersection w/every book (there was a Future's End: 5 Years Later month) - it (sort of obviously) took place in the future of the DC Universe

*Earth 2: World's End, ran around the same time as Future's End and was a weekly series that (I believe) closed out the Earth 2 stories before Darkseid War.

[CaptCleghorn]

DC did this for a few months as well back in the late eighties.

[LordMikel]

Brightest Day was also a weekly series.

[married guy]

DC tried it a few times for diminishing returns every time.

My tip? Read 52 and avoid the rest. 52 was enjoyable as
1. It had a great writing and art team
2. Steve Wacker ran interference from editorial enabling the writers to do their jobs.

Countdown, Brightest Day, Batman Eternal were all average at best.

On a sidenote - the Action Comics weekly run was pretty decent and worth a read. Cheap too!

[tako]

Brightest Day was also a weekly series.

Bi-weekly. Alternating with Justice League: Generation Lost.