and I read that Dan Scott said two versions that he wasn't allowed to use but were mentioned in the story were Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man as well as Tobey Maguire's Spider-Man. That's a shame and would have been really cool to see. I think it's stupid they weren't allowed to use them, because without Marvel, Lee and Ditko, we wouldn't have had a Spider-Man movie in the first place. The movies were based on the comics. But instead it comes around to "Well, we are Sony, we own the rights to the characters, and even though we are not going to make a Spidey movie with Tobey or Andrew, you still can't use it even though your comics were the inspiration for our movies." And if it comes to profits, the filmmakers and actors already made their salaries and back end box office profits so what does it matter?