Originally Posted by
bat39
Honestly, James Bond continuity is only 'convoluted' if you really think too much about it.
The Bond films are largely meant to be episodic. Its all the same guy. Whether you want to believe that Connery's Bond is in a different universe to Dalton's Bond is entirely up to you, but it makes no difference to the narrative of the films. Craig's Bond is a total reboot - yes, the last couple of films have paid homage to a lot of classic stuff, but that doesn't strictly bring those old films back 'in continuity'. Let's see how they handle the franchise after Craig leaves...
The books are simpler. There are Fleming's novels which are largely consistent (apart from a few subtle retcons to Bond's backstory in the later books). A bunch of the recent continuation novels are set in and around the Fleming Bond timeline.
Then you have the continuation novels by authors John Gardener and Raymond Benson, both of which update Bond to the 80's and 90's respectively but maintain the Fleming novels as a vague backstory. Ultimately though, the stories are mostly episodic, so it doesn't really matter much.