Originally Posted by
Swallowtail
You're kind of expecting fans to pick one very small part of the nonsense timeline and say 'this, this one obliquely referenced bit that supports the somewhat
unpopular theory I'm trying get traction on is right'. That's equally hella selective. Every other stupid, nonsensical timeline decision they have to ignore - Harley's been around for 20 years, sure. Duke's still only 16, okay- for an argument they have no investment in.
If I accept that Tim started right after Jason died, and in order to fit the timeline Damian came on the scene just a year or less later, I have to accept that Knightfall and No Man's land didn't happen. That Barbara spent little to no time as Oracle. I have to accept that they thought Jason was dead for less than six months and that he was Under the Red Hood at like 16. If I like those stories what motivation do I have to accept all that doublethink unless I really strongly want to argue that Tim and Dick aren't brothers anymore? Or alternatively why can't I just fit it into my head-canon that the maybe less disruptive option is to accept from Rebirth on that Damian arrived on the scene at 12 and only one year has passed for him? Nobody else seems to have aged and I don't ever remember him turning either 11 or 12 in the comics. So that's the option that's potentially less disruptive to the overall Batfamily timeline, because it only messes up Damian's timeline and not Tim, Bruce, Jason, Barbara's etc.