Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 126
  1. #1
    Extraordinary Member superduperman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Metropolis USA
    Posts
    7,208

    Default So the Kents are alive now?

    Well, this is an interesting read:

    https://www.newsarama.com/45575-wait...alive-now.html

    There seem to be hints that the Kents are now alive again. My guess is, Doomsday Clock was supposed to address this but it's running so long that they just decided to move forward before it's finished. Bendis all but outright says this. We're also seeing hints of this with the JSA returning in JL. So what does this mean for current continuity? Assuming there even is a continuity anymore? Are we officially back to the pre-Flashpoint continuity now?
    Assassinate Putin!

  2. #2
    Savior of the Universe Flash Gordon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    9,021

    Default

    The Kents returning would be ridiculous. I don't get why Clark can't love his parents but have lost them? He's an adult, that is what happens.

  3. #3
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,220

    Default

    It's not really a deal breaker for me or anything but I think the thing that gets me is that Post-Crisis Superman is always played up as this Norman McRegular who just happens to have super powers yet the guy doesn't understand the simplest of human concepts. The guy has this hyper generic back story so as to make him "relatable" but he might as well have grown up on Mars with how

    Say what you will about Pre-Crisis Superman being too alien or whatever but the guy understood simple things like the concept of life and death.
    Rules are for lesser men, Charlie - Grand Pa Joe ~ Willy Wonka & Chocolate Factory

  4. #4
    Legendary Member daBronzeBomma's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Usually at the End of Time
    Posts
    4,586

    Default

    Not going to be get too optimistic just yet, but if this turns out to be true, then Jonathan and Martha better get elevated to permanent Alfred Pennyworth status: too vital as supporting cast to ever be killed off or not used.

    And this time around, less one-mind-in-two-bodies personalities, more opposing viewpoints (Pa worries that Clark is doing too much as Supes, Ma worries that Clark doesn't do enough as Supes, or vice versa).

    They, not Lois, will always be Clark's deepest connection to humanity.

  5. #5
    Savior of the Universe Flash Gordon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    9,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daBronzeBomma View Post
    Not going to be get too optimistic just yet, but if this turns out to be true, then Jonathan and Martha better get elevated to permanent Alfred Pennyworth status: too vital as supporting cast to ever be killed off or not used.

    And this time around, less one-mind-in-two-bodies personalities, more opposing viewpoints (Pa worries that Clark is doing too much as Supes, Ma worries that Clark doesn't do enough as Supes, or vice versa).

    They, not Lois, will always be Clark's deepest connection to humanity.
    So, just curious, what does that do for the story? Can Clark not meet new people in Metropolis (and abroad!) that can worry about him or share the spotlight in his stories? Does Lois have to be his only supporting cast member? Can't there be loads of people he's met on his many adventures?

    I'm not undermining the importance of Ma and Pa Kent, but unfortunately losing your parents is a big part of life. As sad as that is to say.

  6. #6
    Astonishing Member Clark_Kent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Smallville, KS
    Posts
    2,376

    Default

    I would be very happy to see them back, as I see no reason why Clark needs to have lost either one of them to learn some message about "you can't save everyone." Clark is smart, I'm pretty sure he can figure that out on his own (if we get technical, the first time a young Clark lost a pet he would learn this lesson, so we don't need to kill off the Kent's to teach it).

    I know people complain about Post Crisis Clark running home too much every time he had a problem, but if you go back and actually read those stories they don't go the way you remember them. Most of the time, Clark already knew what course of action was needed, he just used his parents as a sounding board. Someone to tell his ideas to...in other words, he was written like an actual person instead of a cartoon character. We all need someone to listen to us vent, Clark should be no different in that regard. I think a lot of people mix up the comics from that time with the Lois & Clark television show, where Clark DID go home every week to whine and cry and ask for help. The first two seasons especially, Clark couldn't solve any problem without his parents telling him how to do it. But that's not how the comics were written, and I think the dude deals with enough alien invasions, 5th dimensional imps, and Doomsdays that he's earned getting to enjoy a living family that isn't his wife or son. Batman's the guy who's alone and surrounds himself with surrogate family...let Clark have this one.

    If this is true though, and his use of "Ma Kent says..." in the latest issue means they are alive, then I suppose that poster who said Bendis' books all take place post-Doomsday Clock deserves a Baldy!
    "Darkseid...always hated music..."

    Every post I make, it should be assumed by the reader that the following statement is attached: "It's all subjective. What works for me doesn't necessarily work for you, and vice versa, and that's ok. You may have a different opinion on it, but this is mine. That's the wonderful thing about being a comics fan, it's all subjective."

  7. #7
    Ultimate Member SiegePerilous02's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    15,234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The World View Post
    It's not really a deal breaker for me or anything but I think the thing that gets me is that Post-Crisis Superman is always played up as this Norman McRegular who just happens to have super powers yet the guy doesn't understand the simplest of human concepts. The guy has this hyper generic back story so as to make him "relatable" but he might as well have grown up on Mars with how

    Say what you will about Pre-Crisis Superman being too alien or whatever but the guy understood simple things like the concept of life and death.
    Quote Originally Posted by Clark_Kent View Post
    I would be very happy to see them back, as I see no reason why Clark needs to have lost either one of them to learn some message about "you can't save everyone." Clark is smart, I'm pretty sure he can figure that out on his own (if we get technical, the first time a young Clark lost a pet he would learn this lesson, so we don't need to kill off the Kent's to teach it).

    I know people complain about Post Crisis Clark running home too much every time he had a problem, but if you go back and actually read those stories they don't go the way you remember them. Most of the time, Clark already knew what course of action was needed, he just used his parents as a sounding board. Someone to tell his ideas to...in other words, he was written like an actual person instead of a cartoon character. We all need someone to listen to us vent, Clark should be no different in that regard. I think a lot of people mix up the comics from that time with the Lois & Clark television show, where Clark DID go home every week to whine and cry and ask for help. The first two seasons especially, Clark couldn't solve any problem without his parents telling him how to do it. But that's not how the comics were written, and I think the dude deals with enough alien invasions, 5th dimensional imps, and Doomsdays that he's earned getting to enjoy a living family that isn't his wife or son. Batman's the guy who's alone and surrounds himself with surrogate family...let Clark have this one.

    If this is true though, and his use of "Ma Kent says..." in the latest issue means they are alive, then I suppose that poster who said Bendis' books all take place post-Doomsday Clock deserves a Baldy!
    I think there is a bit of truth in what both of you say, but I lean more towards the World.

    Personally, I wouldn't mind Ma Kent being alive, but I think it's better for Jonathan to be dead. Something like his death in All Star #6 is pretty essential to Clark's development. The death of Jonathan/the Kents is when Superboy becomes Superman, and I think the only reason they were really around into adulthood post-Crisis is because we otherwise wouldn't see them without the Superboy stories.

    I think their deaths, or at least Jonathan's death, gives Clark some relateable tragedy without going OTT with it. Yeah he/they died and it's sad and he learns the lesson that he cannot prevent everything with all his great power, but he still had all those years with them as loving, supporting parents that he uses as his foundation to get him through adulthood on his own. That's life, and it's an experience a lot of people have, and it doesn't make him Batman. The combination of having the Kents around and making Clark one of the most popular kids in town really makes his backstory way too easy going, and I don't think that's the best thing to give to the most powerful hero DC has who struggles with being seen as one-note and perfect.

  8. #8
    Ultimate Member Sacred Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,725

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SiegePerilous02 View Post
    I think there is a bit of truth in what both of you say, but I lean more towards the World.

    Personally, I wouldn't mind Ma Kent being alive, but I think it's better for Jonathan to be dead. Something like his death in All Star #6 is pretty essential to Clark's development. The death of Jonathan/the Kents is when Superboy becomes Superman, and I think the only reason they were really around into adulthood post-Crisis is because we otherwise wouldn't see them without the Superboy stories.
    I think it also had to do with the post-Crisis movement of humanizing him way more. It might have been thought that having his parents around in adulthood (cue the dreaded word) grounded him further. Just a thought. Either way it was an entirely unnecessary change. They're good characters, essential characters. But they can be just as effective, and I'll always argue vastly moreso, as being shown in the past, and being fond and inspiring memory in the present.
    "They can be a great people Kal-El, they wish to be. They only lack the light to show the way. For this reason above all, their capacity for good, I have sent them you. My only son." - Jor-El

  9. #9
    Invincible Member Vordan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    26,376

    Default

    They’re probably coming back. Wish they weren’t but it’s out of my hands.

    Edit: Calmed down somewhat and I guess I’ll just hope they’re used better going forward.
    Last edited by Vordan; 06-14-2019 at 06:21 PM.

  10. #10
    Legendary Member daBronzeBomma's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Usually at the End of Time
    Posts
    4,586

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash Gordon View Post
    So, just curious, what does that do for the story? Can Clark not meet new people in Metropolis (and abroad!) that can worry about him or share the spotlight in his stories? Does Lois have to be his only supporting cast member? Can't there be loads of people he's met on his many adventures?

    I dunno, having a god-like alien being who can destroy a planet but still has very human parents with whom he has a healthy relationship with in his adult life underlines the appeal of Superman myth to me: the utterly spectacular closely intertwined with the relatably mundane. Kinda why Marvel's Thor or Silver Surfer never really appealed to me.

    To your other point: no, Clark cannot really meet new people with lasting influence in his tales. Because of corporate storytelling and its utter need to not compensate creators for their creations (Chuck Dixon's Bane contract is a high outlier). There's no tangible incentive to create fascinating characters in a corporate IP farm like DC. Thus, almost every new character created by one writer will be discarded by the next in favor of THEIR new pet character. And so on. Only the long-standing recognizable pre-existing supporting characters (like Supes himself) get revamped and reinterpreted over and over again.


    I'm not undermining the importance of Ma and Pa Kent, but unfortunately losing your parents is a big part of life. As sad as that is to say.

    It's a part of real life, where our IRL stories have a beginning and, more importantly, a definitive end. But Superman doesn't have that.

    Part of the reason he stays with us is that his story never ends ... because it is constantly changing. And never progresses past a certain point. He'll never grow old. He'll never be replaced by his son or anyone else.

    Supes needs more fleshed-out 3D characters in his supporting cast. Lois can't be the only one. Jimmy and Kara and Krypto and Perry are good, but do not bring the perspective of the two people who raised a god as a man.

    Also, Kal already lost his parents once. And for those who say it doesn't count because her can't remember it, this is Superman we're talking about. With the demonstrated super- memory. Not a stretch at all if he can remember his time of Krypton and the deaths of Jor-El and Lara.

    He already has had his tragedy.
    Last edited by daBronzeBomma; 06-14-2019 at 06:02 PM.

  11. #11
    Ultimate Member SiegePerilous02's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    15,234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sacred Knight View Post
    I think it also had to do with the post-Crisis movement of humanizing him way more. It might have been thought that having his parents around in adulthood (cue the dreaded word) grounded him further. Just a thought. Either way it was an entirely unnecessary change. They're good characters, essential characters. But they can be just as effective, and I'll always argue vastly moreso, as being shown in the past, and being fond and inspiring memory in the present.
    Which I think is weird, because pre-Crisis Superman seems plenty human to me, just in a kind of neurotic way. Which is way more interesting, IMO.
    And yeah, they are essential, but much like the Els, I'm not terribly interested in them beyond the origin stories. I think the only parental figures I like sticking around that pop in my head are Hippolyta, Aunt May and Corsair (because he's a space pirate and is banging a cat-lady).

  12. #12
    Astonishing Member LordUltimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,189

    Default

    Well, I'm happy about it.

    But clearly, I'm insane and should be ignored.

  13. #13
    Extraordinary Member superduperman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Metropolis USA
    Posts
    7,208

    Default

    I always liked the idea of the Kents still being alive during his career as Superman but now that he has a kid, I like the idea even more. Give Jon grandparents. My point simply is, DC seems to be bringing back all these elements from the pre-Flashpoint era. Every flashback that we see looks like Johns SO. The death of the Kents seemed to be the only thing left of New 52 and now it looks like it might be gone too. Not that I'm complaining. Their deaths were the one thing I didn't like.
    Assassinate Putin!

  14. #14
    Invincible Member Vordan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    26,376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by superduperman View Post
    I always liked the idea of the Kents still being alive during his career as Superman but now that he has a kid, I like the idea even more. Give Jon grandparents. My point simply is, DC seems to be bringing back all these elements from the pre-Flashpoint era. Every flashback that we see looks like Johns SO. The death of the Kents seemed to be the only thing left of New 52 and now it looks like it might be gone too. Not that I'm complaining. Their deaths were the one thing I didn't like.
    Pretty much the ONLY thing they kept was the brief Johns run. That’s it, nothing from Morrison or anyone else. Like Azzarelo WW, New 52 Superman is basically an Elseworld now. Which I guess I’m fine with.

  15. #15
    Astonishing Member Soubhagya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,470

    Default

    What are the chances that only Martha is alive?

    In the panel its said As Ma Kent says.

    A question to fans of New 52 action run by Morrison. Can that Superman, T-shirt wearing, social crusader work with Martha being alive? I think we can all agree that Pa Kent was stellar. He informed Superman's worldview. He had the deathbed speech. But Martha wasn't as memorable. What if she were alive? I would really like Morrison's origin to be the origin. But i love the Kents. Both of them being dead makes me sad. I really liked Martha in the recent films. Man of Steel film had the tragic death. As well as the warmth which Kents bring by being alive.It looks like i am powering the Doomsday/Superman at the end of that Action run. Thinking of ways to improve Superman.
    Last edited by Soubhagya; 06-14-2019 at 11:18 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •