Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 60
  1. #1
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    615

    Default Is Kang a top 5 Marvel Villain?

    Even now moving past Thanos in the mcu, he's not really being brought up as the next big threat. Everyone is ready to see Doom, Galactus, and to see how mutants are diced in. Rumors are Korvac and Osborn might be next..lol. So why is Kang treated like a semi joke??

  2. #2
    Niffleheim
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    6,893

    Default

    Did I miss Feige announcing the next phase?

  3. #3
    Incredible Member your_name_here's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    727

    Default

    I’ve always felt people have struggled to modernise him properly. The closest we got was the Iron-Lad twist in Young Avengers imo.
    I’d like to see him just as much as the next villain because the MCU always seem to do a great job, but I can definitely see the appeal with Doom, Galactus and even Osborn.
    Osborn is perfect for a “Dark Reign” style aspect in the MCU, especially with Spider-Man seeming to talk about “the next iron-man”, but Osborn could definitely fill the boots of the next “Tony Stark”

  4. #4
    Kinky Lil' Canine Snoop Dogg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    7,668

    Default

    Kang has a weird design, an extremely convoluted history, and his most critical stories came from one writer 15 years ago.
    Our main character, a socially awkward outcast, gains newfound confidence and arrogance before committing a string of horrid acts. He then wears a fancy suit and proceeds to dance like a maniac to music that isn't actually there playing around him.

  5. #5
    Mighty Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,175

    Default

    Kang is a pretty complicated villain. He has so many incarnations Rama-Tut (Pharaoh who is tied to Apocalypse), Immortus (a future version of a man already from the future and father of Carol's rapist/son), Iron Lad (Young Avenger), Scarlet Centurion (Don't remember much about him), and base Kang the Conqueror, the Council of Kangs.


    Seriously, this guy competes with Xehanort with the amount of convoluted nonsense he pulls and wins.


    I can see why Avengers EMH has him be a more straightforward villain while Avengers Assemble has him be a generic time traveling asshole.

  6. #6
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    615

    Default

    Sounds like everyone think he's not worth investing into because of the convolution.

  7. #7
    Invincible Member XPac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,833

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MichelleDiMera View Post
    Sounds like everyone think he's not worth investing into because of the convolution.
    He's definately one of the more complicated villains to tackle.

    That said, I think more than anything he's simply not a priority. Marvel getting all the Fox properites back means they're getting a LOT of villains which I suspect marvel simply wants to play with more. Doom and Magneto likely have to be at the top of their list. Doesn't mean they won't get to Kang eventually... but he's likely the first person on their list.

  8. #8
    Boisterously Confused
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,592

    Default

    Kang didn't really start out all that complex, he just got that way as writers began conflating him with first Rama Tut, then Immortus, with a side-trip to "is he or isn't he the future Dr. Doom?"

    Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes did it right. Strip him down to the essentials: a time-traveling conquistador, with technologies that make him (at the very least) the equal of even the most powerful Avenger, with a whole army at his beck-and-call, and give him an excuse for a mad-on at Our Heroes.

    As for the comics, Kang should be one of the premiere nightmares of the MU, but he's not going to be allowed to trump Dr. Doom. His costume could be tweaked a bit to make him more impressive, but as it is, he doesn't display the menace of Ultron. Of course, given the Ultron the MCU gave us, we should maybe be grateful nobody's talking about Kang.

  9. #9
    Benefactor / Malefactor H-E-D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    1,444

    Default

    I think the lack of Kang speculation for the MCU just comes down to him being less known than Doom, Galactus, Osborn, etc. Those are characters that are fairly well known to a larger audience, so they're going to get talked up a lot.

    But I don't think that would be an obstacle to him joining the MCU. If they can do an Eternals movie, they're clearly still unconcerned with the notability of the characters they choose.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralmist View Post
    Did I miss Feige announcing the next phase?
    No, there's not been anything officially announced for the next phase yet. There's a few movies that are too far along in development to be kept secret we know Black Widow, Eternals and Shang-Chi are happening. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 as well. But, officially, they're unannounced. Which basically just means they don't have logos, but still, technicalities.

    We're fairly likely to hear some official announcements at SDCC. If not then, D23.

  10. #10

    Default

    They need to streamline his look. The box head won't work in live action.
    "I just don't get why you wouldn't want to break the law anymore" --Scorpia

  11. #11
    Benefactor / Malefactor H-E-D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    1,444

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Watkins View Post
    They need to streamline his look. The box head won't work in live action.
    On the other hand, how many times have people said "that won't work in live action", and then Marvel just does it anyways and it works?

  12. #12
    Mighty Member chamber-music's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,722

    Default

    I like Kang. A time travelling conquer with advanced tech and a army behind him is a solid concept.

    Not sure what his last decent story was? Probably the whole inhumans think with blackbolt and medusa's kid.

    Being a top villain doesn't depend on the movies. Marvel may not want to use him as a villain because they just did a big time travel based movie

  13. #13
    Mighty Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chamber-music View Post
    Being a top villain doesn't depend on the movies. Marvel may not want to use him as a villain because they just did a big time travel based movie
    Except you could use that time traveling as the impetus for his appearance in the first place because time was broken from what happened.

  14. #14
    Kinky Lil' Canine Snoop Dogg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    7,668

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chamber-music View Post
    I like Kang. A time travelling conquer with advanced tech and a army behind him is a solid concept.

    Not sure what his last decent story was? Probably the whole inhumans think with blackbolt and medusa's kid.

    Being a top villain doesn't depend on the movies. Marvel may not want to use him as a villain because they just did a big time travel based movie
    Waid's Kang War was sexy, but it's another case of him being B-Tier since Kang Dynasty and never being used for a critical Marvel story since that.
    Our main character, a socially awkward outcast, gains newfound confidence and arrogance before committing a string of horrid acts. He then wears a fancy suit and proceeds to dance like a maniac to music that isn't actually there playing around him.

  15. #15
    Unapologetic Feminist Shadowcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Department H
    Posts
    2,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoop Dogg View Post
    Kang has a weird design, an extremely convoluted history, and his most critical stories came from one writer 15 years ago.
    How dare you forget the Celestial Madonna arc, and it’s sequel, the Crossing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •