Originally Posted by
Zaresh
Jason fans, most of then, hate Morrison's Jason, or at least pre-FP Morrison's Jason. And they do usually like Lobdell's Jason almost or as much as Winnicks. Which makes sense, because at this point he has written the character most time than anyone else. And he has a good take of him despite other flaws you could argue about his work.
So why ignoring hishistory under Lobdell at all? If you want to draw Jason's fans to the book it's a bad move. Stick to the continuity as if it were a commandment, I can understand how it could be restrictive for creatitivy. But ignore it in favor of materian that people don't want to acknowledge? Eeh... And I liked Morrison's work in Batman, mostly. But Jason there was something else entirely, and easily the weakest part of it all.