is there a reason Charles looks like The Maker here
intentional by Hickman?
is there a reason Charles looks like The Maker here
intentional by Hickman?
Yup, that about sums it up. I admit I wasn’t as into the idea of the teenaged O5 showing up, but he could have justified the decision if it had been executed well. Maybe things would have played out a little differently if he hadn’t left, but it felt like the story was just treading water by then.
I think it shows how challenging the X-Men are given that really talented and accomplished writers struggle so much with them. Fraction, Gillen, and Bunn are great writers; fantastic creator owned work, and solid work for hire stuff, too. But X-Men seems to have thrown each for a loop in one way or another. Most of it seems to be based on editorial interference or impact from company wide marketing and crossovers.
I’m hoping Hickman can change that trend and can keep his vision in place.
Love the idea of character fusions being this natural thing for mutants. In their history, we have seen many various forms of fusions be they mental or physical:
Xavier and Fantomex
Apocalypse and Cyclops
Psylocke and Kwannon
Amalgam and... well... everyone
The M, Penance and Emplate...situation
The Kleinstocks
Proteus and Piecemeal
Legion and Xman
Douglock
Onslaught
Characters like morlock MeMe.
Mimic’s appearance as a fusion of the original 5.
Mister Sinister working so hard to combine Jean Grey and Cyclops DNA.
This”idea” has come before... and just seems natural to me.
I totally agree with this. It’s when a talented writer is given the space and time to make the book and characters his/her own that you can really see a body of work produced that could be unique. Whether it’s going to be good or not is another matter. You see this a lot with mangakas. However I think another thing that interferes is the constant events. When I first started reading comics with Robin series I saw how each event was like a annoying wrecking ball. Dysrupting Dixons carefully constructed plot.
I would be interested in getting Chris Claremont's take on this if he has read this?
Yeahhhhhhh he's still pathetic when compared to the FF, CIA training or not. Also, why on Earth would Mojo be here?
Honestly it's kind of weird to me that someone is even a fan of Rapertooth in the first place, never mind complaining about him being a low level punk, when thats pretty much all he's ever been. Ranking an entire comic around how one minor character is portrayed in a minor scene is bizarre to me.
Well, although i do agreed that Creed is no threat to the FF and their way out of their league. SF is right when she says that Creed has been consistently portrayed as a punching bag instead of legitimate threat, mostly because he really shouldn't be part of this kind of stories, he is the kind of guy more suited to fight street level people like Cap, DD and Wolverine, so putting him in a position like this is just kind of dumb (also why Scott would accept people like Raven and Victor in Kraoka is beyond, Erik at least hasn't been a villain for some time). so her frustration is understandable, even if i don't think that is enough to give the comic a thumb down.
Also, Creed is a pretty solid villain, conceptually speaking and had some good stories under his belt, so of course that he has fans, even if they aren't many, he just need to be keep away for the big X-Men stuff (especially when you remember that he doesn't care about the Mutant vs Human business).
"Wow. You made Spider-Man sad, congratulations. I stabbed The Hulk last week"
Wolverine, Venom Annual # 1 (2018)
Nobody does it better by Jeff Loveness
"I am Thou, Thou Art I"
Persona