Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Planet Earth

    Default Continuity in comics, how important is it?

    An interesting article from The Splintering regarding two storylines going on at Marvel. To me continuity is very important. Characters should be written consistently, there should be open discussion between writers and editors regarding characters they are using.

  2. #2
    iMan 42s
    Join Date
    Aug 2014


    For a skilled writer they can work around continuity. Continuity is not something that shackles down a character, it's something that accentuates it and can bring layers to a story. Continuity is important as it can even make a bad story good if someone goes in and tries to explain it later. Ultimate Iron man sucks, but revealing it to be a cartoon in-universe even if offhand was a neat way of writing it off and world building.

    There are going to be things we don't like, there are thing I don't like. But you either retcon it with a good alternative to what originally happened when appropriate or not mention it at all. I don't think anyone genuinely enjoys Sins Past over at Marvel, but it hasn't been mentioned in years and can be ignored as it pertains to later stories with Gwen Stacy. I know Dan Slott doesn't like Spider-man killing, but the character has and you don't need to acknowledge those moments for something like No one dies to work.
    For anyone that needs to know why OMD is awful please search the internet for Linkara' s video's specifically his One more day review or his One more day Analysis.

  3. #3
    Boisterously Confused
    Join Date
    Apr 2014


    I have a couple of different views of this.

    First, I'm less interested in history being slavishly clung to than I am characters having consistent behaviors. Event comics tend to be a bit bad about this as their writers sometimes alter characters to facilitate scenes they'd like to play out.

    Second, like SuperiorIronman, there are some events in a character's continuity that should be regarded as sacred canon. Batman's parents are dead. There was a Captain Mar-Vell before the current Captain Marvel. I'm speaking of character-defining episodes that exist in the continuity. Although, there is room for exceptions even to this (Bucky was dead, but Winter Soldier made for an important watershed for both Captain America, and the MU as a whole).

  4. #4
    FF purist/snob CaptCleghorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014


    I think there's also a big difference in IPs like Superman and Spider-Man. Those get a wide variety of styles and stories and for everything to fit together is extremely difficult. Even taking a single series into account, details can often conflict. As DrNewGod said, there are some MAJOR points which define a character. Spidey's "Great Power, Great Responsibility" thing for example.

    But with creator owned stuff like Cerebus, Paper Girls, and any number of others, I'd imagine a stricter continuity would be far more important. Then again, these are single over reaching tales and not episodic adventures as we might see in a daily comic strip. Do we care if Linus disliked oatmeal in a 1964 strip and ate it happily in 1975? (I'm making this all up, it's only an explanatory example)?

    I'm not going to begrudge anyone their love of making it all fit together, but for me personally, a few guidelines are needed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts