We haven't even seen Black Cat yet. Heh...they should get Tobey, Andrew, and Tom to do the clone saga =p
We haven't even seen Black Cat yet. Heh...they should get Tobey, Andrew, and Tom to do the clone saga =p
Last edited by XPac; 08-23-2019 at 10:30 AM.
It's also not like Disney actually needs Spider-Man. I'm sure they would be happy to get whatever extra money from him being more "in-house" as opposed to strictly with Sony, but the MCU will be just fine whether he's there or not.
And we really don't know anything at this point. There's a lot of rumors, theories, etc floating around. Best to just wait until we have something more concrete before deciding who is right/wrong or who messed up.
They got to use Spiderman for Civil War, Infinity War, and End Game. That alone I think made it worth it for them. Not that Spider-Man was needed, but getting him in the MCU was a big deal for the fans and for marvel. If this is all they get, they got enough.
And who knows... they might still come up with an arrangement that works for both parties. If not, but sides are better off because of what they had so no harm no foul.
The issue (for Disney) is that they could have spend time and effort producing their *own* <whatever> movie and making a lot more for it, than producing Spider-Man for Sony.
They still only have finite resources and talented people (and they didn't release anything near Spider-Man to make sure it was a hit as well)
Someone did the math and realized that if they can make Captain Marvel and Black Panther into billion dollar films, it would be a better investment for Feige and Co. to work on Squirrel Girl (or whatever) than to put resources into Spider Man 3. They wanted a bigger cut because they don't need spider-man anymore. However that cut may bigger than Sony figures it would lose than if they went at it alone. So maybe they are both victims of their own successes.