From what little I know of Dr Occult, he isn't considered a superhero, more like a detective. Constantine isn't considered a superhero. In fact, he barely qualifies as a regular hero in the first place.
Yeah, that's called a superhero costume.Crimson avenger didn't either, he just had a mask and red outfit.
When did I say having superpowers was a requirement? I've been very adamant that Jimmy does not qualify in spite of the times he has temporarily gained superpowers.There are plenty of guys that don't have superpowers are still called superheroes.
If Bruce Wayne's status quo is that he is a kindergarten teacher while still being Batman then he is a superhero. If Bruce has retired to be a teacher then he is no longer a superhero. This isn't complicated.Status quo isn't relable factor to judge whether a guy is superhero or not because it changes constantly and there is not even a set time interval for a status quo.
This is a completely different argument entirely. We are talking about what Jimmy Olsen is not what he was or could be. ANd Jimmy was never a superhero as a long lasting status quo. Nor are we talking about whether or no t superhero comics take themselves too seriously which is always a pointless debate that doesn't actually say anything about the stories themselves.That's only cause, modern comics thinks of itself as above of such story lines and too 'mature'.Those transformation haven't been shown postcrisis modern comics. I am sure it has the chance to be popular, if tried. Jimmy can be known as turtle boy or Mr. Action,not just superman's pal.
By your own admission they aren't even doing these types of stories with him anymore.Clark kent persona was a running joke. Now, it's made so serious that people don't even get the joke. Jimmy has saved people and be turned serious as well. So,why isn't jimmy superhero?