I recently ran into a thread. (https://community.cbr.com/showthread...e-about-Batman)
where the discussion was whether morrison's superman was superman at all.There i found insinuations that goldenage superman was too aggressive and too "man of action" to be superman. This made me rather uncomfortable. This is siegel and shuster's superman .That question lead to the discussion on dceu superman as well. My question is,
has the post crisis superman and donner superman left such an impact that we find anything different jarring, even the original golden age take?
How much of it is superficial ? For example the trunks debate.
Is the impact detrimental to the character?
If so, how much?
What version of the character do you think is the "classic superman" or you can say your favourite version ?
If you are a new or postcrisis fan, are you familiar with older takes and differences with superman you grew up with?
What is your opinion on the "classic" superman or the not my superman debate itself(i mean it's tiring) ?