Think about it, Rogue was fighting alongside Mystique, Destiny, and others on behalf of mutants. They wanted to create a world that would offer their species protection from human aggression. They weren't afraid to get into conflict with human-enforcement superteams. They had a certain "noble resistance" quality to them.
Flash forward to now, and the XMen under Hickman are basically trying to become separate from humanity except insofar as they launch missions against oppressors and seek to protect/free vulnerable mutants. We already witnessed a brewing proto-conflict in House of X #1 between Cyclops and the FF. And then in a later issue between Emma Frost/Cuckoos and a human courtroom. So the possibilities for X-Men vs Avengers (or other such groups) are clearly present in this new status quo.
I almost forgot to mention, it's also true that Mystique's BH squad essentially gave GodMoira this entire concept, so that's another strong indicator tying these approaches together.
So I have to ask... what fundamentally is the difference between these two? To my mind, you have to either consider both "villainous" or neither.
Your thoughts? Are both "bad" ways for mutants to go? Both "good"? Or do you believe they're distinguishable and one good one bad?