If it bothers you so much, I'll take it back.
I'm sorry I didn't believe you. I'm sure you'll vote for Bernie if he's the nominee.
I'll go edit my post.
Bernie2020
Not Me. Us
It's not hard at all to understand.
Sanders just tends to sweep it under the rug, as do his supporters, who attack and hold every other Democratic candidate accountable but Sanders himself.
Rest assured -- Trump and the rest of the Republicans won't sweep it under the rug.
He won the popular vote in Iowa, won NH, has a 14 point lead in Nevada compared to the recent poll aggregates, is up double digits nationally, is up big in the biggest state in California, also Maine, Virginia, Utah, Colorado, and in the southern red state’s that are supposed to be his weakness he’s polling in second (Carolina’s and Texas). Also he wins all the head to head polls.
This also isn’t months out where we can say it’s too early to make projections. Nevada is in 3 days. South Carolina is in a week and Super Tuesday is 3 days after that. This is historically where you want to be surging.
Now things can change. But at this crucial point, there is definitely someone who is winning right now by any metric
Zimmerman Sues Buttigieg And Warren For $265MGeorge Zimmerman wants a day in court against two of the leading Democratic presidential contenders, accusing them of defamation.
In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in Florida, the man who killed Trayvon Martin in self-defense in 2012 accused Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of “maliciously defam[ing]” Mr. Zimmerman, using the killing “as a pretext to demagogue and falsely brand Zimmerman as a white supremacist and racist to their millions of Twitter followers.”
Mr. Zimmerman was acquitted of all charges on traditional self-defense grounds, because Martin attacked him and beat his head against the ground, supposedly for profiling the black teen while on a neighborhood-watch shift.
In December, Zimmerman sued the family of Trayvon Martin for $100 million, alleging that they and their lawyer presented an “imposter” witness during his trial.
In recent years Zimmerman has auctioned off the gun used to murder Martin, sold his Confederate flag artwork, and publicly called President Obama a “baboon.”
He being represented in both lawsuits by nutbag attorney Larry Klayman, who is also currently representing loony Laura Loomer and other far-right extremists.
Again...
Where are you getting this set of "Many..." Sanders supporters who have said they won't vote for Bloomberg over Trump?
Like I said, I'm pretty sure I can quote the two times it has been mentioned and I don't really get the impression that one of that pair supports Sanders.
Anything even remotely solid you can point to that actually suggests something like "Many..."?
Posts or something?
Good article by Myke Cole here.
https://newrepublic.com/article/1545...scism-trumpism
The Sparta Fetish Is a Cultural CancerIt's older, but relevant.Last spring, 28 Tory hardliners unleashed another round of havoc on British politics, refusing to vote for Prime Minister Theresa May’s compromise Brexit plan and paving the way for her replacement by Britain’s Trump variant, Boris Johnson. The group of hardcore Euroskeptics dubbed themselves “Spartans” for their singleminded willingness to hold the line, to sacrifice anything in obedience to their convictions. British news outlets ran with the moniker; the Daily Mail praised the group’s efforts to sink its own government as “The last stand of the Spartans.”
Last August, Stewart Rhodes, the founder of the right-wing anti-government and anti-immigration American militia group Oath Keepers, appeared on conspiracy media outlet Infowars to announce the launch of “Spartan training groups” that would prepare armed Americans to defend the country from the “violent left.” The Oath Keepers’ website also invokes Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay “Self Reliance,” which exhorts readers to “hear the whistle of a Spartan fife”—a nod to references in both Thucydides and Plutarch that the Spartans used the double-reeded, oboe-like aulos to keep in step while marching to battle.
Because it’s a fruitless argument. It’s the same argument with anything that costs money. Do you think what you are buying is worth it. For the VAST majority of Americans they save money. This is backed up by multiple independent studies from reputable sources. The people arguing this already know that and are just dragging people in circles so they can find points to continue this bad faith argument. You can only tell someone the answer so many times and watch them pretend to forget it before you stop taking them seriously.
Likewise, economically, multiple studies support Bernie’s system being more cost effective
Now if you want to shift just to wealthy people who will see an increase that won’t be offset. At that point you have to make a decision on whether you think covering everyone is worth the wealthy paying more money. And quite frankly if you think keeping taxes down for the rich should take precedent over the idea that healthcare is something that should be allotted to all citizens, well there is a party that has spent the bulk of the last 30 years taking that stance. But apparently it’s a personal attack if you point that out.
The argument is fruitless when people plead extreme ignorance so they can find reasons to argue.
It says a lot that you're so intent on proving Sanders' supporters will vote for Bloomberg...
...but still won't discuss how Sanders will pay for his policies.