Quite the opposite, planning around virus outbreaks is hardly a new science and it would be useless using Trump as a barometer given how he's shown to be reckless with these decisions. For example, he dissolved the Pandemic Unit Obama's administration left behind.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...encies/608158/
Since you're a Republican we may disagree on many, many things but I think you're smarter than to let yourself to anchored to Trump's decisions which will get people killed.Beth Cameron, a former senior director for global health security and biodefense on the White House National Security Council, complained in The Washington Post on Friday that the Trump administration dissolved her office in 2018, “leaving the country less prepared for pandemics like COVID-19.”
Varies on the Republican governor, some are showing more leadership on this subject than others.
The more people that aren't self isolating means they become at risk for this, everyone is technically at risk of the virus. There isn't a cure, there may not be one for months and then there's the danger of the virus mutating or creating our strains.Your calculation seems to be based on two flaws. The first is the idea that everyone in the country would get COVID-19. The second is the idea that all cases were accurately reported, including those who were asymptomatic.