Page 465 of 1172 FirstFirst ... 365415455461462463464465466467468469475515565965 ... LastLast
Results 6,961 to 6,975 of 17573
  1. #6961
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,396

    Default

    Just saw this on Twitter

    Journo: Pete claimed victory, why should people believe you when you claim victory?
    Bernie: Because I got 6,000 more votes than he did

    “Because I got 6,000 more votes. From where I come, when you get 6,000 more votes that's generally regarded to be the winner.

    Media trying to discredit Bernie win lol.

  2. #6962
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    3,469

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KNIGHT OF THE LAKE View Post
    Spoken like someone who doesn’t understand primaries and just wanted to say words to vent
    Let's be honest. If Bernie doesn't get the nomination Bernie Bros will charge fraud regardless of who wins.

  3. #6963
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,396

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KNIGHT OF THE LAKE View Post
    Spoken like someone who doesn’t understand primaries and just wanted to say words to vent
    I don't have that person on ignore, because watching the ignorance on display is kinda fun. Because the level of trolling is amazing. I just won't respond to them or that person I can't stand posts.

  4. #6964
    Mighty Member Zauriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    1,767

    Default

    Winning only the liberals' votes is not enough. The presidential nominee also needs to win the votes of the moderate and centrist members of the Democratic Party like Bill Clinton and Obama did.

    Bill Clinton won both elections because he was able to attract the moderate voters and independent voters. Obama did the same.

  5. #6965
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,396

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zauriel View Post
    Winning only the liberals' votes is not enough. The presidential nominee also needs to win the votes of the moderate and centrist members of the Democratic Party like Bill Clinton and Obama did.

    Bill Clinton won both elections because he was able to attract the moderate voters and independent voters. Obama did the same.
    That's the rub, Bernie gets all those. There's a media narrative that says he only gets liberals.
    Bernie might have lost to Clinton in the end, and yeah her ties were deep, and to ignore how embedded she was in the process is insane (Not saying you), but he won ALL the rustbelt states.
    Then he went to red states and won them.

    There is so much false info about who Bernie reaches it's nuts. The thing is he knows he needs to get new people to give a ****, because after he, Pelosi, Schumer, and the others die, it's up to them to run things.

  6. #6966
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    5,193

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shooshoomanjoe View Post
    Let's be honest. If Bernie doesn't get the nomination Bernie Bros will charge fraud regardless of who wins.
    Let’s be honest.... things we factually know happened.

    1. A primary Bernie did well in and his chief opponent did poorly in got delayed so that on Thursday between two primary’s he couldn’t campaign as the winner

    2. We know results from a precinct were released against Bernie’s favor that the precinct leaders had to publicly say the DNC got wrong and the DNC had to adjust it in Bernie’s favor.

    3. For most of the week the numbers that were released kept a primary opponent in the lead and as soon as Bernie was projected to win with the final 3 percent the head of the DNC called for a recanvass

    That’s not speculation or reaching. Those are just facts that we know happened

  7. #6967
    Ultimate Member Gray Lensman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    15,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tazirai View Post
    Iowa also has it's own little version of the electoral college, and as we know from the 2016 presidential results, it's the delegates that matter more than the popular vote (even though it shouldn't).
    Dark does not mean deep.

  8. #6968
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tazirai View Post
    That's the rub, Bernie gets all those. There's a media narrative that says he only gets liberals.
    No matter what the "media" says, in the end he has to get the votes to prove he's the best candidate to go into the general election.

    That's why a lot of these "debates" are useless -- the only way people are going to believe Sanders can win is if he has the votes to prove it.

  9. #6969
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,989

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Watkins View Post
    Buttigeg benefited from it. Sanders was screwed by the process.
    What? Buttigieg finishing first or second is a huge win for him and he got robbed by this screw-up. Buttigieg and Sanders are the clear losers.

    Biden was the clear winner. Making this all muddled reduces the impact of the results, so the overperformers lose and the underperformers win. Back off the ledge man.

  10. #6970
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,901

    Default

    "The Billion-Dollar Disinformation Campaign to Reelect the President"

    How new technologies and techniques pioneered by dictators will shape the 2020 election

    "After the 2016 election, much was made of the threats posed to American democracy by foreign disinformation. Stories of Russian troll farms and Macedonian fake-news mills loomed in the national imagination. But while these shadowy outside forces preoccupied politicians and journalists, Trump and his domestic allies were beginning to adopt the same tactics of information warfare that have kept the world’s demagogues and strongmen in power.

    Every presidential campaign sees its share of spin and misdirection, but this year’s contest promises to be different. In conversations with political strategists and other experts, a dystopian picture of the general election comes into view—one shaped by coordinated bot attacks, Potemkin local-news sites, micro-targeted fearmongering, and anonymous mass texting. Both parties will have these tools at their disposal. But in the hands of a president who lies constantly, who traffics in conspiracy theories, and who readily manipulates the levers of government for his own gain, their potential to wreak havoc is enormous.

    The Trump campaign is planning to spend more than $1 billion, and it will be aided by a vast coalition of partisan media, outside political groups, and enterprising freelance operatives. These pro-Trump forces are poised to wage what could be the most extensive disinformation campaign in U.S. history.

    Whether or not it succeeds in reelecting the president, the wreckage it leaves behind could be irreparable."

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...on-war/605530/

  11. #6971
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    5,193

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Theleviathan View Post
    What? Buttigieg finishing first or second is a huge win for him and he got robbed by this screw-up. Buttigieg and Sanders are the clear losers.

    Biden was the clear winner. Making this all muddled reduces the impact of the results, so the overperformers lose and the underperformers win. Back off the ledge man.
    I do agree with this. Buttigieg wanted to campaign on a victory or a surprising showing. He wasn’t able to. Is he’s in 3rd in NH and has to try to overcome that. A strong week of campaigning would help him

  12. #6972
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aja_christopher View Post
    "The Billion-Dollar Disinformation Campaign to Reelect the President"

    How new technologies and techniques pioneered by dictators will shape the 2020 election

    "After the 2016 election, much was made of the threats posed to American democracy by foreign disinformation. Stories of Russian troll farms and Macedonian fake-news mills loomed in the national imagination. But while these shadowy outside forces preoccupied politicians and journalists, Trump and his domestic allies were beginning to adopt the same tactics of information warfare that have kept the world’s demagogues and strongmen in power.

    Every presidential campaign sees its share of spin and misdirection, but this year’s contest promises to be different. In conversations with political strategists and other experts, a dystopian picture of the general election comes into view—one shaped by coordinated bot attacks, Potemkin local-news sites, micro-targeted fearmongering, and anonymous mass texting. Both parties will have these tools at their disposal. But in the hands of a president who lies constantly, who traffics in conspiracy theories, and who readily manipulates the levers of government for his own gain, their potential to wreak havoc is enormous.

    The Trump campaign is planning to spend more than $1 billion, and it will be aided by a vast coalition of partisan media, outside political groups, and enterprising freelance operatives. These pro-Trump forces are poised to wage what could be the most extensive disinformation campaign in U.S. history.

    Whether or not it succeeds in reelecting the president, the wreckage it leaves behind could be irreparable."

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...on-war/605530/
    Long article I read it this morning. But, it truly highlights some of the challenges and uphill battles fighting against the disinformation and propaganda from team trump. And the sheer amount of money they are spending to keep votes uninformed and lied too. On all these platforms. So many people still think if they saw it on Facebook its real and just repost without doing any further checking.

    Not only from the usual suspects at Fox news and conservative radio. They also are using these social media posts to spread lies and distortions

  13. #6973
    Extraordinary Member PaulBullion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    8,394

    Default

    Bernie Bros: "Hillary Clinton winning the popular votes by 3 million votes means NOTHING!"

    Also Bernie Bros: "Bernie Sanders winning the Ioaw popular votes by four people, a coin toss and a pastrami sandwich means EVERYTHING!"
    "How does the Green Goblin have anything to do with Herpes?" - The Dying Detective

    Hillary was right!

  14. #6974

    Default

    BB

  15. #6975
    Postin' since Aug '05 Dalak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,035

    Default

    Tom Perez posted this as an immediate reply clearly visible in your link
    A recanvass is a review of the worksheets from each caucus site to ensure accuracy.

    The IDP will continue to report results.
    So how is that 'scrapping' the caucus? Who benefits from leaving that out besides those who want to sow division and keep up the fighting?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •